Back to Search Start Over

Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials

Authors :
Zwart, M.J.
Jones, L.R.
Fuente, I.
Balduzzi, A.
Takagi, K.
Novak, S.
Stibbe, L.A.
Rooij, T. de
Hilst, J. van der
Rijssen, L.B. van
Dieren, S. van
Vanlander, A.
Boezem, P.B. van den
Daams, F.
Mieog, J.Sven D.
Bonsing, B.A.
Rosman, C.
Festen, S.
Luyer, M.D.
Lips, D.J.
Moser, A.J.
Busch, O.R.
Hilal, M. Abu
Hogg, M.E.
Stommel, M.W.J.
Besselink, Marc G.
Zwart, M.J.
Jones, L.R.
Fuente, I.
Balduzzi, A.
Takagi, K.
Novak, S.
Stibbe, L.A.
Rooij, T. de
Hilst, J. van der
Rijssen, L.B. van
Dieren, S. van
Vanlander, A.
Boezem, P.B. van den
Daams, F.
Mieog, J.Sven D.
Bonsing, B.A.
Rosman, C.
Festen, S.
Luyer, M.D.
Lips, D.J.
Moser, A.J.
Busch, O.R.
Hilal, M. Abu
Hogg, M.E.
Stommel, M.W.J.
Besselink, Marc G.
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques; 4518; 4528; 0930-2794; 6; 36; ~Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques~4518~4528~~~0930-2794~6~36~~
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 251550.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)<br />BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery may improve surgical performance during minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy but comparative studies are lacking. This study assessed the impact of robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy on surgical performance and operative time using a standardized biotissue model for pancreatico- and hepatico-jejunostomy using pooled data from two randomized controlled crossover trials (RCTs). METHODS: Pooled analysis of data from two RCTs with 60 participants (36 surgeons, 24 residents) from 11 countries (December 2017-July 2019) was conducted. Each included participant completed two pancreatico- and two hepatico-jejunostomies in biotissue using 3D-robotic surgery, 3D-laparoscopy, or 2D-laparoscopy. Primary outcomes were the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS: 12-60) rating, scored by observers blinded for 3D/2D and the operative time required to complete both anastomoses. Sensitivity analysis excluded participants with excess experience compared to others. RESULTS: A total of 220 anastomoses were completed (robotic 80, 3D-laparoscopy 70, 2D-laparoscopy 70). Participants in the robotic group had less surgical experience [median 1 (0-2) versus 6 years (4-12), p < 0.001], as compared to the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery resulted in higher OSATS ratings (50, 43, 39 points, p = .021 and p < .001) and shorter operative time (56.5, 65.0, 81.5 min, p = .055 and p < .001), as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy, respectively, which remained in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: In a pooled analysis of two RCTs in a biotissue model, robotic surgery resulted in better surgical performance scores and shorter operative time for biotissue pancreatic and biliary anastomoses, as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques; 4518; 4528; 0930-2794; 6; 36; ~Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques~4518~4528~~~0930-2794~6~36~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1366854565
Document Type :
Electronic Resource