Back to Search
Start Over
Cross-border comparison of the Dutch and German guidelines on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms
- Source :
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control; 7; 2047-2994; 4; ~Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control~7~~~~2047-2994~~4~~
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 154905.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)<br />BACKGROUND: In all European countries, hospital-acquired infections caused by Gram-negative multidrug-resistant microorganisms (GN-MDRO) are a major health threat, as these pathogens cannot be adequately treated anymore, or the start of effective antibiotic treatment is delayed. The efforts to limit the selection and spread of GN-MDRO remains a problem in cross-border healthcare, as the national guidelines on hygiene standards applicable for patients colonized or infected with GN-MDRO in hospitals are not harmonized between European countries. METHODS: In order to point out the similarities and differences in the national guidelines of Germany and The Netherlands regarding GN-MDRO, guidelines were compared and an expert workshop was organized by the INTERREG IVa project EurSafety Health-net. RESULTS: Both guidelines divide the Gram-negative organisms into subgroups based on bacterial species and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in order to define multidrug-resistant variants of these bacteria. However, the Dutch guideline defines that GN-MDRO Enterobacteriaceae requires testing for certain mechanisms causing antibiotic resistance, whereas the German guideline makes use of a newly created classification scheme, based on phenotypic characterization. Besides diagnostic issues, the main difference between the Dutch and German guideline is the divergent evaluation of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Special hygiene measures are required for all patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in The Netherlands, whereas the German guideline recommends special precautions only for those cases in which patients are colonized or infected with strains showing co-resistance to ciprofloxacin ("3MRGN"). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of consistent terminology and harmonized diagnostic procedures would improve the possibilities for infection prevention, treatment and patient safety. Prevention of severe non-treatable infections and outbreaks due to MDRO, caused by an increased popula
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control; 7; 2047-2994; 4; ~Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control~7~~~~2047-2994~~4~~
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1366851402
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource