Back to Search Start Over

Front-line treatment of ceritinib improves efficacy over crizotinib for Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion NSCLC: The role of systemic progression control

Authors :
Huang, Shih-Hao
Huang, Allen Chung-Cheng
Wang, Chin-Chou
Chang, Wen-Chen
Liu, Chien-Ying
Pavlidis, Stelios
Ko, Ho-Wen
Chung, Fu-Tsai
Hsu, Ping-Chih
Guo, Yike
Kuo, Chih-Hsi Scott
Yang, Cheng-Ta
Huang, Shih-Hao
Huang, Allen Chung-Cheng
Wang, Chin-Chou
Chang, Wen-Chen
Liu, Chien-Ying
Pavlidis, Stelios
Ko, Ho-Wen
Chung, Fu-Tsai
Hsu, Ping-Chih
Guo, Yike
Kuo, Chih-Hsi Scott
Yang, Cheng-Ta
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Approximately 3%–5% of lung adenocarcinoma is driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene, whose activity can be suppressed by multiple ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib and ceritinib have demonstrated superior efficacy to platinum-based chemotherapy as front-line treatment for patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the direct comparison between them in the front-line setting remains lacking. Methods: A total of 48 patients with ALK-positive, previously untreated advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib and ceritinib as front-line treatment were retrospectively investigated. The efficacy and pattern of disease progression were analyzed. Results: Patients receiving ceritinib treatment were significantly younger than those receiving crizotinib treatment (52.0 vs. 63.0, P = 0.016). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with ceritinib than with crizotinib treatment (32.3 vs. 12.9 months; log-rank P = 0.020); the hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.08–0.90; P = 0.033). An objective response was noted in all patients in the ceritinib group and in 23 patients in the crizotinib group (74.2%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 88.5). The rate of systemic progression was significantly lower over time with ceritinib treatment compared to crizotinib treatment (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.73; P = 0.014). Serious adverse events were noted in one (2.9%) patient showing elevated liver function in the crizotinib group and three (23.1%) patients showing diarrhea in the ceritinib group. Dose reduction was needed in five out of 13 (38.5%) patients receiving ceritinib treatment. Conclusion: Ceritinib showed higher efficacy associated with a better control of systemic progression compared to crizotinib for the front-line treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLCs. © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1363082451
Document Type :
Electronic Resource