Back to Search Start Over

MAX-DOAS observations of aerosols, formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide in the Beijing area: Comparison of two profile retrieval approaches

Authors :
Vlemmix, T. (author)
Hendrick, F. (author)
Pinardi, G. (author)
De Smedt, I. (author)
Fayt, C. (author)
Hermans, C. (author)
Piters, A. (author)
Wang, P. (author)
Levelt, P.F. (author)
Van Roozendael, M. (author)
Vlemmix, T. (author)
Hendrick, F. (author)
Pinardi, G. (author)
De Smedt, I. (author)
Fayt, C. (author)
Hermans, C. (author)
Piters, A. (author)
Wang, P. (author)
Levelt, P.F. (author)
Van Roozendael, M. (author)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

A 4-year data set of MAX-DOAS observations in the Beijing area (2008–2012) is analysed with a focus on NO2, HCHO and aerosols. Two very different retrieval methods are applied. Method A describes the tropospheric profile with 13 layers and makes use of the optimal estimation method. Method B uses 2–4 parameters to describe the tropospheric profile and an inversion based on a least-squares fit. For each constituent (NO2, HCHO and aerosols) the retrieval outcomes are compared in terms of tropospheric column densities, surface concentrations and "characteristic profile heights" (i.e. the height below which 75% of the vertically integrated tropospheric column density resides). We find best agreement between the two methods for tropospheric NO2 column densities, with a standard deviation of relative differences below 10%, a correlation of 0.99 and a linear regression with a slope of 1.03. For tropospheric HCHO column densities we find a similar slope, but also a systematic bias of almost 10% which is likely related to differences in profile height. Aerosol optical depths (AODs) retrieved with method B are 20% high compared to method A. They are more in agreement with AERONET measurements, which are on average only 5% lower, however with considerable relative differences (standard deviation ~ 25%). With respect to near-surface volume mixing ratios and aerosol extinction we find considerably larger relative differences: 10 ± 30, ?23 ± 28 and ?8 ± 33% for aerosols, HCHO and NO2 respectively. The frequency distributions of these near-surface concentrations show however a quite good agreement, and this indicates that near-surface concentrations derived from MAX-DOAS are certainly useful in a climatological sense. A major difference between the two methods is the dynamic range of retrieved characteristic profile heights which is larger for method B than for method A. This effect is most pronounced for HCHO, where retrieved profile shapes with method A are very close to the a p<br />Geoscience & Remote Sensing<br />Civil Engineering and Geosciences

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1357815396
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194.amt-8-941-2015