Back to Search Start Over

CheckMate 384: Phase IIIb/IV trial of nivolumab (nivo) 480 mg Q4W versus 240 mg Q2W after ≤ 12 months of nivo in previously treated advanced NSCLC

Authors :
Garon, Edward B.
Reinmuth, Niels
Falchero, Lionel
Garcia Garcia, Yolanda
Hureaux, José
Gore, Ira
Harris, Ronald P.
Bidoli, Paolo
Baldini, Editta
Ros, Silverio
Laack, Eckart
Mitchell, Paul
Wolf, Martin
O'byrne, Kenneth John
Zibdawi, Labib
Jao, Kevin
Spigel, David
Li, Ang
Rabindran, Sridhar K.
Pichon, Eric
Garon, Edward B.
Reinmuth, Niels
Falchero, Lionel
Garcia Garcia, Yolanda
Hureaux, José
Gore, Ira
Harris, Ronald P.
Bidoli, Paolo
Baldini, Editta
Ros, Silverio
Laack, Eckart
Mitchell, Paul
Wolf, Martin
O'byrne, Kenneth John
Zibdawi, Labib
Jao, Kevin
Spigel, David
Li, Ang
Rabindran, Sridhar K.
Pichon, Eric
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Nivo is approved as 240 mg Q2W in the EU and Japan and 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W in the US and Canada for second-line treatment (tx) of advanced NSCLC. Pharmacokinetic modeling in various tumors predicts that exposure, efficacy and safety can be maintained with less frequent Q4W dosing, which may provide a more convenient tx option. We present an interim analysis of efficacy and safety from CheckMate 384 (NCT02713867), an international, open-label, randomized phase 3b/4 trial evaluating less frequent nivo dosing (480 mg Q4W vs 240 mg Q2W) in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC and prior Q2W nivo tx. Methods: Pts (N = 329) with previously treated histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status 0–2, and prior tx with nivo 3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W for ≤12 mo, with ≥2 consecutive assessments of complete / partial response or stable disease, were randomized 1:1 to nivo 480 mg Q4W or 240 mg Q2W over a 30-min infusion. Co-primary endpoints: post-randomization (RND) progression-free survival rates (PFS) at 6 mo and 1 y. Secondary endpoints included safety. Due to tx landscape changes in NSCLC, statistical analyses were amended for a reduced sample size. One-sided 95% CIs were generated to compare PFS rates; presented data analyses are descriptive. Results: Of 166 and 163 pts randomized to 480 mg Q4W and 240 mg Q2W, 164 and 161 pts were treated, respectively. Median follow-up was 9.5 mo (480 mg Q4W) and 10.2 mo (240 mg Q2W). Baseline characteristics were balanced between tx arms. Stratified PFS rates post-RND were comparable between tx arms at 6 mo and 1 y (Table). Safety profiles were similar; any grade tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) and TRAEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 48% vs 61% and 6% vs 9% of pts with 480 mg Q4W vs 240 mg Q2W. No tx-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Nivo 480 mg Q4W showed similar efficacy and safety to 240 mg Q2W in pts with disease control on nivo, supporting the potential use of 48

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1343978893
Document Type :
Electronic Resource