Back to Search Start Over

A Brief, Daily, Online Mental Health and Well-being Intervention for University Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Description and Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Design

Authors :
Parker, A
Dash, Sarah
Bourke, M
Patten, R
Craike, M
Baldwin, P
Hosking, W
Levinger, I
Apostolopoulos, V
de Courten, M
Sharples, J
Naslund, M
Stavropoulos, V
Woessner, M
Sonn, C
Stansen, C
Pascoe, M
Parker, A
Dash, Sarah
Bourke, M
Patten, R
Craike, M
Baldwin, P
Hosking, W
Levinger, I
Apostolopoulos, V
de Courten, M
Sharples, J
Naslund, M
Stavropoulos, V
Woessner, M
Sonn, C
Stansen, C
Pascoe, M
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The unprecedented changes and isolation measures to contain COVID-19 have had multiple psychological and social impacts, with implications for professional and personal functioning. Evidence-informed interventions that can be rapidly implemented under pandemic conditions to support mental health during such times are urgently needed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability and preliminary outcomes of a daily online mental health promotion program for tertiary education staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The “Victoria University (VU) Elevenses” program was delivered as an uncontrolled intervention at Victoria University (VU) in the western metropolitan region of Melbourne, Australia. In April 2020, an email invitation was sent to all academic and professional staff inviting them to: (1) participate in the program and (2) opt-in to the research component. The “VU Elevenses” program provided 10-15–minute microinterventions comprising lifestyle and well-being strategies to promote mental health via an online meeting platform at 11 AM each weekday. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate the program, combining structured questionnaires with semistructured interviews to investigate the experiences of staff who participated in the program.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Between 16 and 90 participants provided weekly program feedback. A total of 106 university staff opted into the longitudinal research component and 10 staff participated in the interviews. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with sessions and perceived benefits for mental health. Approximately one quarter of participants reported moderate to severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress at basel

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
16 p., English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1337836936
Document Type :
Electronic Resource