Back to Search Start Over

Early indicators of disease progression in Fabry disease that may indicate the need for disease-specific treatment initiation : findings from the opinion-based PREDICT-FD modified Delphi consensus initiative

Authors :
Hughes, Derralynn A
Aguiar, Patrício
Deegan, Patrick B
Ezgu, Fatih
Frustaci, Andrea
Lidove, Olivier
Linhart, Aleš
Lubanda, Jean-Claude
Moon, James C
Nicholls, Kathleen
Niu, Dau-Ming
Nowak, Albina
Ramaswami, Uma
Reisin, Ricardo
Rozenfeld, Paula
Schiffmann, Raphael
Svarstad, Einar
Thomas, Mark
Torra Balcells, Roser
Vujkovac, Bojan
Warnock, David G
West, Michael L
Johnson, Jack
Rolfe, Mark J
Feriozzi, Sandro
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Hughes, Derralynn A
Aguiar, Patrício
Deegan, Patrick B
Ezgu, Fatih
Frustaci, Andrea
Lidove, Olivier
Linhart, Aleš
Lubanda, Jean-Claude
Moon, James C
Nicholls, Kathleen
Niu, Dau-Ming
Nowak, Albina
Ramaswami, Uma
Reisin, Ricardo
Rozenfeld, Paula
Schiffmann, Raphael
Svarstad, Einar
Thomas, Mark
Torra Balcells, Roser
Vujkovac, Bojan
Warnock, David G
West, Michael L
Johnson, Jack
Rolfe, Mark J
Feriozzi, Sandro
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The PRoposing Early Disease Indicators for Clinical Tracking in Fabry Disease (PREDICT-FD) initiative aimed to reach consensus among a panel of global experts on early indicators of disease progression that may justify FD-specific treatment initiation. Anonymous feedback from panellists via online questionnaires was analysed using a modified Delphi consensus technique. Questionnaires and data were managed by an independent administrator directed by two non-voting cochairs. First, possible early indicators of renal, cardiac and central/peripheral nervous system (CNS/PNS) damage, and other disease and patient-reported indicators assessable in routine clinical practice were compiled by the cochairs and administrator from panellists' free-text responses. Second, the panel scored indicators for importance (5-point scale: 1=not important; 5=extremely important); indicators scoring ≥3 among >75% of panellists were then rated for agreement (5-point scale: 1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree). Indicators awarded an agreement score ≥4 by >67% of panellists achieved consensus. Finally, any panel-proposed refinements to consensus indicator definitions were adopted if >75% of panellists agreed. A panel of 21 expert clinicians from 15 countries provided information from which 83 possible current indicators of damage (kidney, 15; cardiac, 15; CNS/PNS, 13; other, 16; patient reported, 24) were compiled. Of 45 indicators meeting the importance criteria, consensus was reached for 29 and consolidated as 27 indicators (kidney, 6; cardiac, 10; CNS/PNS, 2; other, 6; patient reported, 3) including: (kidney) elevated albumin:creatinine ratio, histological damage, microalbuminuria; (cardiac) markers of early systolic/diastolic dysfunction, elevated serum cardiac troponin; (CNS/PNS) neuropathic pain, gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal neuropathy; (other) pain in extremities/neuropathy, angiokeratoma; (patient-reported) febrile crises, progression of symptoms/signs. Pa

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1337029405
Document Type :
Electronic Resource