Back to Search Start Over

Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science

Authors :
Department of Energy (US)
Biological and Environmental Research (US)
Graham, Emily B.
Averill, Colin
Bond-Lamberty, Ben
Knelman, Joseph E.
Krause, Stefan
Peralta, Ariane L.
Shade, Ashley
Smith, A. Peyton
Cheng, Susan J.
Fanin, Nicolas
Freund, Cathryn
García, Patricia E.
Gibbons, Sean M.
Goethem, Marc W. van
Guebila, Marouen Ben
Kemppinen, Julia
Nowicki, Robert J.
Pausas, J. G.
Reed, Samuel P.
Rocca, Jennifer
Sengupta, Aditi
Sihi, Debjani
Simonin, Marie
Słowiński, Michał
Spawn, Seth A.
Sutherland, Ira
Tonkin, Jonathan D.
Wisnoski, Nathan I.
Zipper, Samuel C.
Department of Energy (US)
Biological and Environmental Research (US)
Graham, Emily B.
Averill, Colin
Bond-Lamberty, Ben
Knelman, Joseph E.
Krause, Stefan
Peralta, Ariane L.
Shade, Ashley
Smith, A. Peyton
Cheng, Susan J.
Fanin, Nicolas
Freund, Cathryn
García, Patricia E.
Gibbons, Sean M.
Goethem, Marc W. van
Guebila, Marouen Ben
Kemppinen, Julia
Nowicki, Robert J.
Pausas, J. G.
Reed, Samuel P.
Rocca, Jennifer
Sengupta, Aditi
Sihi, Debjani
Simonin, Marie
Słowiński, Michał
Spawn, Seth A.
Sutherland, Ira
Tonkin, Jonathan D.
Wisnoski, Nathan I.
Zipper, Samuel C.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Disturbances fundamentally alter ecosystem functions, yet predicting their impacts remains a key scientific challenge. While the study of disturbances is ubiquitous across many ecological disciplines, there is no agreed-upon, cross-disciplinary foundation for discussing or quantifying the complexity of disturbances, and no consistent terminology or methodologies exist. This inconsistency presents an increasingly urgent challenge due to accelerating global change and the threat of interacting disturbances that can destabilize ecosystem responses. By harvesting the expertise of an interdisciplinary cohort of contributors spanning 42 institutions across 15 countries, we identified an essential limitation in disturbance ecology: the word ‘disturbance’ is used interchangeably to refer to both the events that cause, and the consequences of, ecological change, despite fundamental distinctions between the two meanings. In response, we developed a generalizable framework of ecosystem disturbances, providing a well-defined lexicon for understanding disturbances across perspectives and scales. The framework results from ideas that resonate across multiple scientific disciplines and provides a baseline standard to compare disturbances across fields. This framework can be supplemented by discipline-specific variables to provide maximum benefit to both inter- and intra-disciplinary research. To support future syntheses and meta-analyses of disturbance research, we also encourage researchers to be explicit in how they define disturbance drivers and impacts, and we recommend minimum reporting standards that are applicable regardless of scale. Finally, we discuss the primary factors we considered when developing a baseline framework and propose four future directions to advance our interdisciplinary understanding of disturbances and their social-ecological impacts: integrating across ecological scales, understanding disturbance interactions, establishing baselines and trajectories

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1333182884
Document Type :
Electronic Resource