Back to Search Start Over

Coronary Angiography-Derived Diastolic Pressure Ratio

Authors :
Gong, Yanjun
Feng, Yundi
Yi, Tieci
Yang, Fan
Li, Yuxi
Zhang, Long
Zheng, Bo
Hong, Tao
Liu, Zhaoping
Huo, Yunlong
Li, Jianping
Huo, Yong
Gong, Yanjun
Feng, Yundi
Yi, Tieci
Yang, Fan
Li, Yuxi
Zhang, Long
Zheng, Bo
Hong, Tao
Liu, Zhaoping
Huo, Yunlong
Li, Jianping
Huo, Yong
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Aims Based on the aortic pressure waveform, a specially designed computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method was proposed to determine coronary angiography-derived diastolic pressure ratio (caDPR) without using invasive pressure wire. The aim of the study is to retrospectively assess diagnostic performance of the caDPR in the catheterization laboratory, based on a previous multicenter trial for online assessment of coronary angiography-derived FFR (caFFR). Methods and Results Patients with diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris were enrolled in six centers. Wire-derived FFR was measured in coronary arteries with 30-90% diameter stenosis. Offline caDPR was assessed in blinded fashion against wire-derived FFR at an independent core laboratory. A total of 330 patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled from June 26 to December 18, 2018. Offline computed caDPR and wire-derived FFR were compared in 328 interrogated vessels. The caDPR with a cutoff value of 0.89 shows diagnostic accuracy of 87.7%, sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 86.8%, and AUC of 0.940 against the wire-derived FFR with a cutoff value of 0.80. Conclusions Using wired-based FFR as the standard reference, there is good diagnostic performance of the novel-CFD-design caDPR. Hence, caDPR could enhance the hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1331247647
Document Type :
Electronic Resource