Back to Search Start Over

Les actions judiciaires des spéculateurs sur les dettes souveraines : réglementer les activités des fonds dits « vautours » dans un souci de soutenabilité

Authors :
UCL - SSH/JURI - Institut pour la recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences juridiques
UCL - Faculté de droit et de criminologie
Dubuisson, Bernard
Autenne, Alexia
Lequesne Roth, Caroline
d'Argent, Pierre
Wautelet, Patrick
van Drooghenbroeck, Jean-François
Vanderschuren, Justin
UCL - SSH/JURI - Institut pour la recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences juridiques
UCL - Faculté de droit et de criminologie
Dubuisson, Bernard
Autenne, Alexia
Lequesne Roth, Caroline
d'Argent, Pierre
Wautelet, Patrick
van Drooghenbroeck, Jean-François
Vanderschuren, Justin
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

This doctoral dissertation deals with distressed sovereign debts. It analyzes the regulation of the so-called “vulture funds”, and proposes a new judicial approach in order to better address their activities. The actions of some state creditors have been debated over the last decades. Speculative funds acquire on the secondary market debts owed by states that have difficulties paying them back. As the UN expert Cephas Lumina explains, sovereign debts can be bought by these entities at a reduced price relative to their face value. Indeed, primary creditors prefer to collect this price rather than initiating lengthy proceedings and taking the risk of eventually failing to get reimbursed. Thereafter, these funds often attempt through litigation to seek repayment of the full face value of the repurchased debts together with interest, penalties, and legal fees. Speculative funds call upon worldwide jurisdictions to condemn their sovereign debtors and to seize their assets. Incidentally, they refuse to take part in debt restructurings. The most famous case that reflects this phenomenon is Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., an entity that had bought a large part of the country’s debt. The financial issues raised by the covid crisis will certainly increase the occurrence of sovereign indebtedness. This situation calls for special attention. Despite legal actions filed by speculative funds being legally compliant, as they are based on the pacta sunt servanda rule which means that contracts have to be honored, there are increasing concerns, mainly from the civil society, about the morality and ethics of such proceedings. The nature of secondary market debts makes heavily indebted states particularly vulnerable to the reviewed profiteering. The speculative funds are often criticized for crippling human rights since they deprive states and their population of needed resources. Moreover, their speculative activities disturb debt restructurings. Conversely, the funds arg<br />(DROI - Sciences juridiques) -- UCL, 2021

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
French
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1328226569
Document Type :
Electronic Resource