Back to Search Start Over

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Perspectives, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and HIV Risk Profiles of Cisgender Women Seeking and Initiating PrEP in a US Demonstration Project.

Authors :
Blumenthal, Jill
Blumenthal, Jill
Landovitz, Raphael
Jain, Sonia
He, Feng
Kofron, Ryan
Ellorin, Eric
Ntim, Gifty M
Stockman, Jamila K
Corado, Katya
Rivet Amico, K
Moore, David J
Morris, Sheldon
Blumenthal, Jill
Blumenthal, Jill
Landovitz, Raphael
Jain, Sonia
He, Feng
Kofron, Ryan
Ellorin, Eric
Ntim, Gifty M
Stockman, Jamila K
Corado, Katya
Rivet Amico, K
Moore, David J
Morris, Sheldon
Source :
AIDS patient care and STDs; vol 35, iss 12, 481-487; 1087-2914
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Little information is known about the cisgender women who seek and initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention in the United States. Adherence Enhancement Guided by Individualized Texting and Drug Levels was a 48-week single-arm open-label demonstration study of daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumaratel emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in cisgender women ≥ 18 years old at risk for HIV. Participants were surveyed at screening and enrollment about sociodemographics, HIV risk perception and behaviors, and PrEP perspectives and aggregated into three risk groups according to HIV sexual risk behavior: being in a serodiscordant partnership (SD), engaging in sex work (SW), and having partners with unknown HIV status at risk for HIV (UP). One hundred sixty-seven women presented for screening with n = 31 screen failures. Of the 162 women completing enrollment, mean age was 40 (standard deviation 11), with 41% non-Hispanic Black, 22% non-Hispanic White, and 19% Latina. Compared with those who screened ineligible, enrolled participants were more likely to have heard of PrEP, had higher HIV risk perception, and reported higher perceived PrEP efficacy. Sixty-four women (47%) were categorized as SD, 21 (15%) as SW, and 51 (38%) as UP. The SW were more likely to report higher levels of drinking and drug use (p = 0.002) and history of intimate partner violence in the past year (p < 0.001) compared with SD and UP. Among cisgender women enrolled, there were significant differences between the three risk groups by demographics, HIV risk behavior, and PrEP perspectives, suggesting that interventions to successfully implement PrEP in US women may need to be tailored by HIV risk group. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02584140.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
AIDS patient care and STDs; vol 35, iss 12, 481-487; 1087-2914
Notes :
AIDS patient care and STDs vol 35, iss 12, 481-487 1087-2914
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1325587061
Document Type :
Electronic Resource