Back to Search Start Over

Tracking and predicting COVID-19 radiological trajectory on chest X-rays using deep learning

Authors :
Gourdeau, Daniel
Potvin, Olivier
Archambault, Patrick
Chartrand‑Lefebvre, Carl
Dieumegarde, Louis
Forghani, Reza
Gagné, Christian
Hains, Alexandre
Hornstein, David
Le-Khac, Huy.
Lemieux, Simon
Lévesque, Marie-Hélène
Martin, Diego
Tang, An
Vecchio, Fabrizio
Yang, Issac
Duchesne, Nathalie
Duchesne, Simon
Gourdeau, Daniel
Potvin, Olivier
Archambault, Patrick
Chartrand‑Lefebvre, Carl
Dieumegarde, Louis
Forghani, Reza
Gagné, Christian
Hains, Alexandre
Hornstein, David
Le-Khac, Huy.
Lemieux, Simon
Lévesque, Marie-Hélène
Martin, Diego
Tang, An
Vecchio, Fabrizio
Yang, Issac
Duchesne, Nathalie
Duchesne, Simon
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Radiological fndings on chest X-ray (CXR) have shown to be essential for the proper management of COVID-19 patients as the maximum severity over the course of the disease is closely linked to the outcome. As such, evaluation of future severity from current CXR would be highly desirable. We trained a repurposed deep learning algorithm on the CheXnet open dataset (224,316 chest X-ray images of 65,240 unique patients) to extract features that mapped to radiological labels. We collected CXRs of COVID-19-positive patients from an open-source dataset (COVID-19 image data collection) and from a multi-institutional local ICU dataset. The data was grouped into pairs of sequential CXRs and were categorized into three categories: ‘Worse’, ‘Stable’, or ‘Improved’ on the basis of radiological evolution ascertained from images and reports. Classical machine-learning algorithms were trained on the deep learning extracted features to perform immediate severity evaluation and prediction of future radiological trajectory. Receiver operating characteristic analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. Deep learning predictions between “Worse” and “Improved” outcome categories and for severity stratifcation were signifcantly diferent for three radiological signs and one diagnostic (‘Consolidation’, ‘Lung Lesion’, ‘Pleural efusion’ and ‘Pneumonia’; all P < 0.05). Features from the frst CXR of each pair could correctly predict the outcome category between ‘Worse’ and ‘Improved’ cases with a 0.81 (0.74–0.83 95% CI) AUC in the open-access dataset and with a 0.66 (0.67–0.64 95% CI) AUC in the ICU dataset. Features extracted from the CXR could predict disease severity with a 52.3% accuracy in a 4-way classifcation. Severity evaluation trained on the COVID-19 image data collection had good out-of-distribution generalization when testing on the local dataset, with 81.6% of intubated ICU patients being classifed as critically ill, and the predicted severity was correlated with the clinical ou

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315767309
Document Type :
Electronic Resource