Back to Search Start Over

Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study

Authors :
Dunbar, JA
Hernan, AL
Janus, ED
Vartiainen, E
Laatikainen, T
Versace, VL
Reynolds, J
Best, JD
Skinner, TC
O'Reilly, SL
Mc Namara, KP
Stewart, E
Coates, M
Bennett, CM
Carter, R
Dunbar, JA
Hernan, AL
Janus, ED
Vartiainen, E
Laatikainen, T
Versace, VL
Reynolds, J
Best, JD
Skinner, TC
O'Reilly, SL
Mc Namara, KP
Stewart, E
Coates, M
Bennett, CM
Carter, R
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (-1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (-1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (-5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was -1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315684780
Document Type :
Electronic Resource