Back to Search Start Over

A large-scale meta-analysis to refine colorectal cancer risk estimates associated with MUTYH variants

Authors :
Theodoratou, E
Campbell, H
Tenesa, A
Houlston, R
Webb, E
Lubbe, S
Broderick, P
Gallinger, S
Croitoru, EM
Jenkins, MA
Win, AK
Cleary, SP
Koessler, T
Pharoah, PD
Kuery, S
Bezieau, S
Buecher, B
Ellis, NA
Peterlongo, P
Offit, K
Aaltonen, LA
Enholm, S
Lindblom, A
Zhou, X-L
Tomlinson, IP
Moreno, V
Blanco, I
Capella, G
Barnetson, R
Porteous, ME
Dunlop, MG
Farrington, SM
Theodoratou, E
Campbell, H
Tenesa, A
Houlston, R
Webb, E
Lubbe, S
Broderick, P
Gallinger, S
Croitoru, EM
Jenkins, MA
Win, AK
Cleary, SP
Koessler, T
Pharoah, PD
Kuery, S
Bezieau, S
Buecher, B
Ellis, NA
Peterlongo, P
Offit, K
Aaltonen, LA
Enholm, S
Lindblom, A
Zhou, X-L
Tomlinson, IP
Moreno, V
Blanco, I
Capella, G
Barnetson, R
Porteous, ME
Dunlop, MG
Farrington, SM
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: defective DNA repair has a causal role in hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). Defects in the base excision repair gene MUTYH are responsible for MUTYH-associated polyposis and CRC predisposition as an autosomal recessive trait. Numerous reports have suggested MUTYH mono-allelic variants to be low penetrance risk alleles. We report a large collaborative meta-analysis to assess and refine CRC risk estimates associated with bi-allelic and mono-allelic MUTYH variants and investigate age and sex influence on risk. METHODS: MUTYH genotype data were included from 20 565 cases and 15 524 controls. Three logistic regression models were tested: a crude model; adjusted for age and sex; adjusted for age, sex and study. RESULTS: all three models produced very similar results. MUTYH bi-allelic carriers demonstrated a 28-fold increase in risk (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.95-115). Significant bi-allelic effects were also observed for G396D and Y179C/G396D compound heterozygotes and a marginal mono-allelic effect for variant Y179C (odds ratio (OR)=1.34; 95% CI: 1.00-1.80). A pooled meta-analysis of all published and unpublished datasets submitted showed bi-allelic effects for MUTYH, G396D and Y179C (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.02-23.2; OR=6.47, 95% CI: 2.33-18.0; OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.14-9.89) and marginal mono-allelic effect for variants MUTYH (OR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.34) and Y179C alone (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: overall, this large study refines estimates of disease risk associated with mono-allelic and bi-allelic MUTYH carriers.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1315666294
Document Type :
Electronic Resource