Back to Search Start Over

Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT compared with positron emission tomography CT to characterise solitary pulmonary nodules: the SPUtNIk diagnostic accuracy study and economic modelling

Authors :
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Harris, Scott
Miles, Kenneth A.
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R. Weir
Qureshi, Nagmi R.
Rintoul, Robert C.
Clegg, Andrew
Benedetto, Valerio
Hill, James Edward
Et, Al
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Harris, Scott
Miles, Kenneth A.
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R. Weir
Qureshi, Nagmi R.
Rintoul, Robert C.
Clegg, Andrew
Benedetto, Valerio
Hill, James Edward
Et, Al
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Current pathways recommend positron emission tomography-computerised tomography for the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography may be a more cost-effective approach. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic performances of dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography and positron emission tomography-computerised tomography in the NHS for solitary pulmonary nodules. Systematic reviews and a health economic evaluation contributed to the decision-analytic modelling to assess the likely costs and health outcomes resulting from incorporation of dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography into management strategies. Design: Multicentre comparative accuracy trial. Setting: Secondary or tertiary outpatient settings at 16 hospitals in the UK. Participants: Participants with solitary pulmonary nodules of ≥ 8 mm and of ≤ 30 mm in size with no malignancy in the previous 2 years were included. Interventions: Baseline positron emission tomography-computerised tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced computer tomography with 2 years' follow-up. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for positron emission tomography-computerised tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared management strategies that used dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography with management strategies that did not use dynamic contrast-enhanced computerised tomography. Results: A total of 380 patients were recruited (median age 69 years). Of 312 patients with matched dynamic contrast-enhanced computer tomography and positron emission tomography-computerised tomography examinations, 191 (61%) were cancer patients. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for positron emission tomography-computerised tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced computer tomography were 72.8% (95% confidence

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1312676437
Document Type :
Electronic Resource