Back to Search Start Over

Assessing the rockfall protection efficiency of forests at the regional scale

Authors :
Lanfranconi, C
Sala, G
Frattini, P
Crosta, G
Valagussa, A
Lanfranconi C.
Sala G.
Frattini P.
Crosta G. B.
Valagussa A.
Lanfranconi, C
Sala, G
Frattini, P
Crosta, G
Valagussa, A
Lanfranconi C.
Sala G.
Frattini P.
Crosta G. B.
Valagussa A.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to achieve a quantitative assessment of rockfall protection forest efficiency at regional scale, considering site specific forest, morphological and lithological parameters. At first, a semi-automatic GIS-based method, integrated with a multi-scenario 3D-rockfall model realized by using the simulation code HY-STONE, was used to map protection forests of Regione Lombardia (central Italian Alps). For each different forest type, a rockfall protective efficiency was assessed by using empirical (energy line angle) and modelling (HY-STONE) approaches. The empirical approach shows an increase of the energy line angle value from about 36° for the bare slopes to over 40° in forested slopes, with a value ranging from 37° to 44° for different forests types. The modelling approach is based on a new efficiency index EEI ranging from 0 (minimum efficiency, equal to no forest condition) to 1 (maximum efficiency): the efficiency of different forest types ranges from 0.08 to 0.98 by using average values of the controlling parameters. To modulate the efficiency in each single forest at regional scale, a set of parametric simulations was performed to evaluate the effects of controlling parameters. The parametric simulations show that block volume, slope gradient, DBH (diameter at breast height) and forest density are the most important parameters at controlling the efficiency. These parameters were used within a multiple linear regression function to associate a protection efficiency to each specific protection forest in the regional map. This allows to discriminate quantitatively the individual forests according to their actual efficiency. Most of the protection forest area (46%) shows an efficiency greater than 0.50 and only the 24% of the total covered area shows a value lower than 0.25.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
ELETTRONICO, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1308935849
Document Type :
Electronic Resource