Back to Search Start Over

Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke

Authors :
Boncoraglio, G
Ranieri, M
Bersano, A
Parati, E
Giovane, C
Boncoraglio G. B.
Ranieri M.
Bersano A.
Parati E. A.
Giovane C. D.
Boncoraglio, G
Ranieri, M
Bersano, A
Parati, E
Giovane, C
Boncoraglio G. B.
Ranieri M.
Bersano A.
Parati E. A.
Giovane C. D.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with very large healthcare and social costs, and a strong demand for alternative therapeutic approaches. Preclinical studies have shown that stem cells transplanted into the brain can lead to functional improvement. However, to date, evidence for the benefits of stem cell transplantation in people with ischemic stroke is lacking. This is the first update of the Cochrane review published in 2010. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of stem cell transplantation compared with control in people with ischemic stroke. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2018), CENTRAL (last searched August 2018), MED-LINE (1966 to August 2018), Embase (1980 to August 2018), and BIOSIS (1926 to August 2018). We handsearched potentially relevant conference proceedings, screened reference lists, and searched ongoing trials and research registers (last searched August 2018). We also contacted individuals active in the field and stem cell manufacturers (last contacted August 2018). Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that recruited people with ischemic stroke, in any phase of the disease (acute, subacute or chronic), and an ischemic lesion confirmed by computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. We included all types of stem cell transplantation, regardless of cell source (autograft, allograft, or xenograft; embryonic, fetal, or adult; from brain or other tissues), route of cell administration (systemic or local), and dosage. The primary outcome was efficacy (assessed as neurologic impairment or functional outcome) at longer term follow-up (minimum six months). Secondary outcomes included post-procedure safety outcomes (death, worsening of neurological deficit, infections, and neoplastic transformation). Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1308931403
Document Type :
Electronic Resource