Back to Search Start Over

National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden

Authors :
Lampic, Claudia
Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
Gudmundsson, Johannes
Leandersson, Pia
Solensten, Nils-Gunnar
Thurin-Kjellberg, Ann
Wånggren, Kjell
Sydsjö, Gunilla
Lampic, Claudia
Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
Gudmundsson, Johannes
Leandersson, Pia
Solensten, Nils-Gunnar
Thurin-Kjellberg, Ann
Wånggren, Kjell
Sydsjö, Gunilla
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION What characterizes the group of donor-conceived (DC) individuals who request information about their identity-release sperm donor in Sweden, and what are their experiences of disclosure, information receipt and donor contact? SUMMARY ANSWER Following three decades of identity-release donation in Sweden, few DC individuals have requested donor information with varying experiences of information receipt and donor contact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In 1985, Sweden was the first country worldwide to enact legislation that gave DC individuals the right to obtain identifying information about their donor. Since then, identity-release gamete donation has become available in many countries but there is limited knowledge about the individuals who request donor information. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A nation-wide cross-sectional survey study was performed at all seven University hospitals that provided donation treatment in Sweden during 1985-2002. During this period only donor insemination to heterosexual couples was permitted. Inclusion criteria were being 18 years of age or older, conceived with donor sperm and having requested information about the donor by December 2020. Recruitment was performed during 2016-2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 60 individuals had requested information about their donor. Of these, 53 were approached and 40 individuals, representing 34 families, accepted study participation (75% response rate). Participants completed a postal survey with the WHO-10 well-being index and study-specific questions about experiences of disclosure, motivations for requesting donor information, receipt of information, as well as intentions and experiences of donor contact. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare ratings of participants with early and late disclosure. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE Of similar to 900 DC individuals who had reached adult age, a total of 60 (approximate to 7%) had requested inf<br />Funding Agencies|Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [2013-2712]

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1306513360
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093.humrep.deab275