Back to Search Start Over

Sirflox: Randomised phase III trial comparing first-line mFOLFOX6 +/- bevacizumab (BEV) versus mFOLFOX6 +/- BEV + selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)-analysis by presence or absence of extra-hepatic metastases, BEV treatment and site of first progression.

Authors :
Tichler T.
Strickland A.
Walpole E.
Boucher E.
Gebski V.
Van Buskirk M.
Gibbs P.
Van Hazel G.A.
Heinemann V.
Sharma N.K.
Findlay M.P.N.
Ricke J.
Peeters M.
Perez D.
Robinson B.
Ferguson T.
Rodrigez J.
Kroening H.
Wolf I.
Ganju V.
Tichler T.
Strickland A.
Walpole E.
Boucher E.
Gebski V.
Van Buskirk M.
Gibbs P.
Van Hazel G.A.
Heinemann V.
Sharma N.K.
Findlay M.P.N.
Ricke J.
Peeters M.
Perez D.
Robinson B.
Ferguson T.
Rodrigez J.
Kroening H.
Wolf I.
Ganju V.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: The SIRFLOX study assessed the efficacy and safety of combining FOLFOX chemotherapy (+/- bev) with SIRT as first-line treatment of patients with CRC liver metastases. Planned sub-analyses analyses included +/- extra-hepatic metastases, +/- bev and site of first progression. Method(s): SIRFLOX was an international, multi-centre, open-label, RCT in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-resectable, liver-only or liverdominant mCRC. Arm A: mFOLFOX6 +/- bev vs. arm B: mFOLFOX6 +/- bev +SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres; Sirtex) administered once with cycle 1. The primary endpoint was overall PFS using RECIST v1.0. Stratification variables included +/- extra-hepatic metastases, and +/- bev. Liver PFS was assessed by Competing Risk analysis. First progression was judged by independent reader blinded to study arm. Result(s): 530 patients were randomised (A, n = 263; B, n = 267), 212 (40%) had EHD; 292 (55%) received bev. Median follow-up was 36.1 months. Median overall PFS was 10.2 vs. 10.7 months in A vs. B, respectively (p = 0.428). Median liver PFS was 12.6 vs. 20.5 months in A vs. B (p = 0.002). Median Liver PFS was 12.4 vs. 21.1 months in A vs. B (p = 0.003) for patients with liver-only metastases, and 12.6 vs. 16.7 months (p = 0.147) for those with liver and extra-hepatic metastases. Median Liver PFS was 10.6 vs. 18.9 months in A vs. B (p = 0.028) for patients with ITT -bev, and 12.7 vs. 21.0 months (p = 0.018) for those with ITT +bev. The site of first progression was more frequently the liver (+/- other sites) in A [164/ 178, 92.1%] vs. B [120/166, 72.3%] (p < 0.001). All-causality grade >=3 adverse events occurred in 73.3% vs. 85.4% (NS) of patients in A vs. B. Conclusion(s): In first-line treatment of patients with non-resectable CRC liver metastases, adding SIRT to FOLFOX-based chemotherapy failed to improve overall PFS. The addition of SIRT significantly extended median liver PFS and reduced the frequency that first disease progres

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1305120180
Document Type :
Electronic Resource