Back to Search Start Over

Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors :
Webster P.
Roseby R.
Polnay A.
Priest N.
Waters E.
Spencer N.
Baxi R.
Sharma M.
Webster P.
Roseby R.
Polnay A.
Priest N.
Waters E.
Spencer N.
Baxi R.
Sharma M.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: Children's exposure to other people's cigarette smoke (environmental tobacco smoke, or ETS) is associated with a range of adverse health outcomes for children. Parental smoking is a common source of children's exposure to ETS. Older children are also at risk of exposure to ETS in child care or educational settings. Preventing exposure to cigarette smoke in infancy and childhood has significant potential to improve children's health worldwide. Objective(s): To determine the effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce exposure of children to ETS. Search Method(s): We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register and conducted additional searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and The Social Science Citation Index & Science Citation Index (Web of Knowledge). Date of the most recent search: September 2013. Selection Criteria: Controlled trials with or without random allocation. Interventions must have addressed participants (parents and other family members, child care workers and teachers) involved with the care and education of infants and young children (aged 0 to 12 years). All mechanisms for reduction of children's ETS exposure, and smoking prevention, cessation, and control programmes were included. These include health promotion, social-behavioural therapies, technology, education, and clinical interventions. Data Collection and Analysis: Two authors independently assessed studies and extracted data. Due to heterogeneity of methodologies and outcome measures, no summary measures were possible and results were synthesised narratively. Main Result(s): Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were judged to be at low risk of bias, 27 studies were judged to have unclear overall risk of bias and 23 studies were judged to have high risk of bias. Seven interventions were targeted at populations or community settings, 23 studies were conduc

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1305117710
Document Type :
Electronic Resource