Back to Search Start Over

Adaptive design: adaptation and adoption of patient safety practices in daily routines, a multi-site study

Authors :
Dekker-van Doorn, C.M. (Connie)
Wauben, L
Wijngaarden, J.D.H. (Jeroen) van
Lange, J.F. (Johan)
Huijsman, R. (Robbert)
Dekker-van Doorn, C.M. (Connie)
Wauben, L
Wijngaarden, J.D.H. (Jeroen) van
Lange, J.F. (Johan)
Huijsman, R. (Robbert)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background Most interventions to improve patient safety (Patient Safety Practices (PSPs)), are introduced without engaging front-line professionals. Administrative staff, managers and sometimes a few professionals, representing only one or two disciplines, decide what to change and how. Consequently, PSPs are not fully adapted to the professionals’ needs or to the local context and as a result, adoption is low. To support adoption, two theoretical concepts, Participatory Design and Experiential Learning were combined in a new model: Adaptive Design. The aim was to explore whether Adaptive Design supports adaptation and adoption of PSPs by engaging all professionals and creating time to (re) design, reflect and learn as a team. The Time Out Procedure (TOP) and Debriefing (plus) for improving patient safety in the operating theatre (OT) was used as PSP. Methods Qualitative exploratory multi-site study using participatory action research as a research design. The implementation process consisted of four phases: 1) start-up: providing information by presentations and team meetings, 2) pilot: testing the prototype with 100 surgical procedures, 3) small scale implementation: with one or two surgical disciplines, 4) implementation hospital-wide: including all surgical disciplines. In iterations, teams (re) designed, tested, evaluated, and if necessary adapted TOPplus. Gradually all professionals were included. Adaptations in content, process and layout of TOPplus were measured following each iteration. Adoption was monitored until final implementation in every hospital’s OT. Results 10 Dutch hospitals participated. Adaptations varied per hospital, but all hospitals adapted both procedures. Adaptations concerned the content, process and layout of TOPplus. Both procedures were adopted in all OTs, but user participation and time to include all users varied between hospitals. Ultimately all users were actively involved and TOPplus was implemented in all OTs. Conclusions Engagi

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, BMC Health Services Research vol. 20, pp. 1-13, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1302111377
Document Type :
Electronic Resource