Back to Search
Start Over
NEOadjuvant therapy monitoring with PET and CT in Esophageal Cancer (NEOPEC-trial).
- Source :
- BMC Medical Physics; 3; 3; 1756-6649; 31-07-2008; vol. 8; ~BMC Medical Physics~3~3~~~1756-6649~31-07-2008~8~~
- Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 70883.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)<br />BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the preferred treatment of potentially curable esophageal cancer. To improve long term patient outcome, many institutes apply neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In a large proportion of patients no response to chemoradiotherapy is achieved. These patients suffer from toxic and ineffective neoadjuvant treatment, while appropriate surgical therapy is delayed. For this reason a diagnostic test that allows for accurate prediction of tumor response early during chemoradiotherapy is of crucial importance. CT-scan and endoscopic ultrasound have limited accuracy in predicting histopathologic tumor response. Data suggest that metabolic changes in tumor tissue as measured by FDG-PET predict response better. This study aims to compare FDG-PET and CT-scan for the early prediction of non-response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: Prognostic accuracy study, embedded in a randomized multicenter Dutch trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for 5 weeks followed by surgery versus surgery alone for esophageal cancer. This prognostic accuracy study is performed only in the neoadjuvant arm of the randomized trial. In 6 centers, 150 consecutive patients will be included over a 3 year period. FDG-PET and CT-scan will be performed before and 2 weeks after the start of the chemoradiotherapy. All patients complete the 5 weeks regimen of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, regardless the test results. Pathological examination of the surgical resection specimen will be used as reference standard. Responders are defined as patients with < 10% viable residual tumor cells (Mandard-score).Difference in accuracy (area under ROC curve) and negative predictive value between FDG-PET and CT-scan are primary endpoints. Furthermore, an economic evaluation will be performed, comparing survival and costs associated with the use of FDG-PET (or CT-scan) to predict tumor response with survival and
Details
- Database :
- OAIster
- Journal :
- BMC Medical Physics; 3; 3; 1756-6649; 31-07-2008; vol. 8; ~BMC Medical Physics~3~3~~~1756-6649~31-07-2008~8~~
- Publication Type :
- Electronic Resource
- Accession number :
- edsoai.on1298877791
- Document Type :
- Electronic Resource