Back to Search Start Over

Discordance of international adiposity classifications in Australian boys and girls - The LOOK study

Authors :
Telford, Richard
Cunningham, Ross
Daly, Robin M
Reynolds, Graham
Lafferty, Antony
Gravenmaker, Karen J
Budge, Marc
Javaid, A
Bass, Shona L
Telford, Rohan M
Telford, Richard
Cunningham, Ross
Daly, Robin M
Reynolds, Graham
Lafferty, Antony
Gravenmaker, Karen J
Budge, Marc
Javaid, A
Bass, Shona L
Telford, Rohan M
Source :
Annals of Human Biology
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Background: Various charts based on body mass index (BMI) and per cent body fat (%BF) are used to classify childhood body composition but outcomes may vary. Aim: The study investigated variation in incidences of childhood obesity as depicted by four classification charts. Subjects and methods: BMI and DXA-derived %BF were assessed in 741 children. Incidences of overweight and obesity were compared between two BMI charts and two bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-based %BF charts. Results: The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF)-adopted BMI chart designated 21%, 6% (boys), and 26%, 9% (girls) as overweight and obese, respectively. Corresponding figures using the USA CDC BMI chart were 27%, 11% (boys) and 27%, 12% (girls). Using a USA-derived %BF chart incidences were 17%, 2% (boys) and 21%, 8% (girls) and using a UK-derived %BF chart 51%, 24% (boys) and 53%, 36% (girls). Sensitivity of BMI varied according to the %BF reference chart. Conclusions: In contrast to the BMI-based charts, there were considerable variations in depicted incidences of obesity between the %BF-based charts. These discordances were considered to result from previously reported variation within and between BIA and DXA %BF assessments underlying the charts. The present study highlights the need for valid, reliable, unchanging BIA and DXA procedures.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Annals of Human Biology
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1291767859
Document Type :
Electronic Resource