Back to Search Start Over

Sacubitril-valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Authors :
Jackson, Alice M.
Jhund, Pardeep S.
Anand, Inder S.
Duengen, Hans-Dirk
Lam, Carolyn S. P.
Lefkowitz, Marty P.
Linssen, Gerard
Lund, Lars H.
Maggioni, Aldo P.
Pfeffer, Marc A.
Rouleau, Jean L.
Saraiva, Jose F. K.
Senni, Michele
Vardeny, Orly
Wijkman, Magnus
Yilmaz, Mehmet B.
Saito, Yoshihiko
Zile, Michael R.
Solomon, Scott D.
McMurray, John J. V
Jackson, Alice M.
Jhund, Pardeep S.
Anand, Inder S.
Duengen, Hans-Dirk
Lam, Carolyn S. P.
Lefkowitz, Marty P.
Linssen, Gerard
Lund, Lars H.
Maggioni, Aldo P.
Pfeffer, Marc A.
Rouleau, Jean L.
Saraiva, Jose F. K.
Senni, Michele
Vardeny, Orly
Wijkman, Magnus
Yilmaz, Mehmet B.
Saito, Yoshihiko
Zile, Michael R.
Solomon, Scott D.
McMurray, John J. V
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently have difficult-to-control hypertension. We examined the effect of neprilysin inhibition on apparent resistant hypertension in patients with HFpEF in the PARAGON-HF trial, which compared the effect of sacubitril-valsartan with valsartan. Methods and results: In this post hoc analysis, patients were categorized according to systolic blood pressure at the end of the valsartan run-in (n=4795). Apparent resistant hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >= 14 0mmHg (>= 135 mmHg if diabetes) despite treatment with valsartan, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic. Apparent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-resistant hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >= 140 mmHg (>= 135 mmHg if diabetes) despite the above treatments and an MRA. The primary outcome in the PARAGON-HF trial was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We examined clinical endpoints and the safety of sacubitril-valsartan according to the hypertension category. We also examined reductions in blood pressure from the end of valsartan run-in to Weeks 4 and 16 after randomization. Overall, 731 patients (15.2%) had apparent resistant hypertension and 135 (2.8%) had apparent MRA-resistant hypertension. The rate of the primary outcome was higher in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [17.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.6-19.1 per 100 person-years] compared to those with a controlled systolic blood pressure (13.4; 12.7-14.3 per 100 person-years), with an adjusted rate ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.05-1.57). The reduction in systolic blood pressure at Weeks 4 and 16, respectively, was greater with sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with apparent resistant hypertension [-4.8 (-7.0 to -2.5) and 3.9 (-6.6 to -1.3) mmHg] and apparent MRA-resistant hypertension [-8.8 (-14.0 to -3.5) and -6.3 (-12.5 to<br />Funding Agencies: A.M.J. is supported by a British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship (FS/18/14/33330) and J.J.V.M. is supported by a British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Grant (RE/18/6/34217).

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1290426997
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093.eurheartj.ehab499