Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Olfactory Working Group consensus statement on the treatment of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction.

Authors :
UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience
UCL - (SLuc) Service d'oto-rhino-laryngologie
Addison, Alfred B
Wong, Billy
Ahmed, Tanzime
Macchi, Alberto
Konstantinidis, Iordanis
Huart, Caroline
Frasnelli, Johannes
Fjaeldstad, Alexander W
Ramakrishnan, Vijay R
Rombaux, Philippe
Whitcroft, Katherine L
Holbrook, Eric H
Poletti, Sophia C
Hsieh, Julien W
Landis, Basile N
Boardman, James
Welge-Lüssen, Antje
Maru, Devina
Hummel, Thomas
Philpott, Carl M
UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience
UCL - (SLuc) Service d'oto-rhino-laryngologie
Addison, Alfred B
Wong, Billy
Ahmed, Tanzime
Macchi, Alberto
Konstantinidis, Iordanis
Huart, Caroline
Frasnelli, Johannes
Fjaeldstad, Alexander W
Ramakrishnan, Vijay R
Rombaux, Philippe
Whitcroft, Katherine L
Holbrook, Eric H
Poletti, Sophia C
Hsieh, Julien W
Landis, Basile N
Boardman, James
Welge-Lüssen, Antje
Maru, Devina
Hummel, Thomas
Philpott, Carl M
Source :
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, Vol. 147, no.5, p. 1704-1719 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Respiratory tract viruses are the second most common cause of olfactory dysfunction. As we learn more about the effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the recognition that olfactory dysfunction is a key symptom of this disease process, there is a greater need than ever for evidence-based management of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD). Our aim was to provide an evidence-based practical guide to the management of PIOD (including post-coronavirus 2019 cases) for both primary care practitioners and hospital specialists. A systematic review of the treatment options available for the management of PIOD was performed. The written systematic review was then circulated among the members of the Clinical Olfactory Working Group for their perusal before roundtable expert discussion of the treatment options. The group also undertook a survey to determine their current clinical practice with regard to treatment of PIOD. The search resulted in 467 citations, of which 107 articles were fully reviewed and analyzed for eligibility; 40 citations fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were randomized controlled trials. In total, 15 of the articles specifically looked at PIOD whereas the other 25 included other etiologies for olfactory dysfunction. The Clinical Olfactory Working Group members made an overwhelming recommendation for olfactory training; none recommended monocycline antibiotics. The diagnostic role of oral steroids was discussed; some group members were in favor of vitamin A drops. Further research is needed to confirm the place of other therapeutic options.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, Vol. 147, no.5, p. 1704-1719 (2021)
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1288279209
Document Type :
Electronic Resource