Back to Search Start Over

Appropriateness of Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations in an Academic Emergency Department Observation Unit

Authors :
Glover, McKinley
Glover, McKinley
Gottumukkala, Ravi
Sanchez, Yadiel
Yun, Brian J.
Benzer, Theodore I.
White, Benjamin A.
Prabhakar, Anand M.
Raja, Ali S.
Glover, McKinley
Glover, McKinley
Gottumukkala, Ravi
Sanchez, Yadiel
Yun, Brian J.
Benzer, Theodore I.
White, Benjamin A.
Prabhakar, Anand M.
Raja, Ali S.
Source :
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health; vol 19, iss 3; 1936-900X
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) and hospitals face increasing challenges related to capacity, throughput, and stewardship of limited resources while maintaining high quality. Appropriate utilization of extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations within the emergency setting is not well known. Therefore, this study aimed to determine indications for and appropriateness of MRI of the extremities for musculoskeletal conditions in the ED observation unit (EDOU).Methods: We conducted this institutional review board-approved, retrospective study in a large, quaternary care academic center and Level I trauma center. An institutional database was queried retrospectively to identify all adult patients undergoing an extremity MRI while in the EDOU during the two-year study period from October 2013 through September 2015. We compared clinical history with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® for musculoskeletal indications. The primary outcome was appropriateness of musculoskeletal MRI exams of the extremities; examinations with an ACR Criteria score of seven or higher were deemed appropriate. Secondary measures included MRI utilization and imaging findings. Results: During the study period, 22,713 patients were evaluated in the EDOU. Of those patients, 4,409 had at least one MRI performed, and 88 MRIs met inclusion criteria as musculoskeletal extremity examinations (2% of all patients undergoing an MRI exam in the EDOU during the study period). The most common exams were foot (27, 31%); knee (26, 30%); leg/femur (10, 11%); and shoulder (10, 11%). The most common indications were suspected infection (42, 48%) and acute trauma (23, 26%). Fifty-six percent of exams were performed with intravenous contrast; and 83% (73) of all MRIs were deemed appropriate based on ACR Criteria. The most common reason for inappropriate imaging was lack of performance of radiographs prior to MRI. Conclusion: The majority of musculoskeletal extremity

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health; vol 19, iss 3; 1936-900X
Notes :
application/pdf, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health vol 19, iss 3 1936-900X
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1287453868
Document Type :
Electronic Resource