Back to Search Start Over

Implementation science for ambulatory care safety: a novel method to develop context-sensitive interventions to reduce quality gaps in monitoring high-risk patients.

Authors :
McDonald, Kathryn M
McDonald, Kathryn M
Su, George
Lisker, Sarah
Patterson, Emily S
Sarkar, Urmimala
McDonald, Kathryn M
McDonald, Kathryn M
Su, George
Lisker, Sarah
Patterson, Emily S
Sarkar, Urmimala
Source :
Implementation science : IS; vol 12, iss 1, 79; 1748-5908
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

BackgroundMissed evidence-based monitoring in high-risk conditions (e.g., cancer) leads to delayed diagnosis. Current technological solutions fail to close this safety gap. In response, we aim to demonstrate a novel method to identify common vulnerabilities across clinics and generate attributes for context-flexible population-level monitoring solutions for widespread implementation to improve quality.MethodsBased on interviews with staff in otolaryngology, pulmonary, urology, breast, and gastroenterology clinics at a large urban publicly funded health system, we applied journey mapping to co-develop a visual representation of how patients are monitored for high-risk conditions. Using a National Academies framework and context-sensitivity theory, we identified common systems vulnerabilities and developed preliminary concepts for improving the robustness for monitoring patients with high-risk conditions ("design seeds" for potential solutions). Finally, we conducted a face validity and prioritization assessment of the design seeds with the original interviewees.ResultsWe identified five high-risk situations for potentially consequential diagnostic delays arising from suboptimal patient monitoring. All situations related to detection of cancer (head and neck, lung, prostate, breast, and colorectal). With clinic participants we created 5 journey maps, each representing specialty clinic workflow directed at evidence-based monitoring. System vulnerabilities common to the different clinics included challenges with: data systems, communications handoffs, population-level tracking, and patient activities. Clinic staff ranked 13 design seeds (e.g., keep patient list up to date, use triggered notifications) addressing these vulnerabilities. Each design seed has unique evaluation criteria for the usefulness of potential solutions developed from the seed.ConclusionsWe identified and ranked 13 design seeds that characterize situations that clinicians described 'wake them up at n

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Implementation science : IS; vol 12, iss 1, 79; 1748-5908
Notes :
application/pdf, Implementation science : IS vol 12, iss 1, 79 1748-5908
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1287356203
Document Type :
Electronic Resource