Back to Search Start Over

Estimating soil organic carbon changes in managed temperate moist grasslands with RothC

Authors :
Fundación Cándido Iturriaga y María Doñabeitia
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
European Commission
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge [0000-0002-0192-7954]
Jebari, Asma
Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge
Pardo,Guillermo
Almagro, María
Prado, Agustín del
Fundación Cándido Iturriaga y María Doñabeitia
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
European Commission
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge [0000-0002-0192-7954]
Jebari, Asma
Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge
Pardo,Guillermo
Almagro, María
Prado, Agustín del
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Temperate grassland soils store significant amounts of carbon (C). Estimating how much livestock grazing and manuring can influence grassland soil organic carbon (SOC) is key to improve greenhouse gas grassland budgets. The Rothamsted Carbon (RothC) model, although originally developed and parameterized to model the turnover of organic C in arable topsoil, has been widely used, with varied success, to estimate SOC changes in grassland under different climates, soils, and management conditions. In this paper, we hypothesise that RothC-based SOC predictions in managed grasslands under temperate moist climatic conditions can be improved by incorporating small modifications to the model based on existing field data from diverse experimental locations in Europe. For this, we described and evaluated changes at the level of: (1) the soil water function of RothC, (2) entry pools accounting for the degradability of the exogenous organic matter (EOM) applied (e.g., ruminant excreta), (3) the month-on-month change in the quality of C inputs coming from plant residues (i.e above-, below-ground plant residue and rhizodeposits), and (4) the livestock trampling effect (i.e., poaching damage) as a common problem in areas with higher annual precipitation. In order to evaluate the potential utility of these changes, we performed a simple sensitivity analysis and tested the model predictions against averaged data from four grassland experiments in Europe. Our evaluation showed that the default model’s performance was 78% and whereas some of the modifications seemed to improve RothC SOC predictions (model performance of 95% and 86% for soil water function and plant residues, respectively), others did not lead to any/or almost any improvement (model performance of 80 and 46% for the change in the C input quality and livestock trampling, respectively). We concluded that, whereas adding more complexity to the RothC model by adding the livestock trampling would actually not improve the mod

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1286582440
Document Type :
Electronic Resource