Back to Search Start Over

Intercomparison and characterization of 23 Aethalometers under laboratory and ambient air conditions: procedures and unit-to-unit variabilities

Authors :
Minguillón, María Cruz [0000-0002-5464-0391]
Cuesta-Mosquera, Andrea
Močnik, Griša
Drinovec, Luka
Müller, Thomas
Pfeifer, Sascha
Minguillón, María Cruz
Briel, Björn
Buckley, Paul
Dudoitis, Vadimas
Fernández-García, Javier
Fernández-Amado, María
Ferreira De Brito, Joel
Riffault, Veronique
Flentje, Harald
Heffernan, Eimear
Kalivitis, Nikos
Kalogridis, Athina-Cerise
Keernik, Hannes
Marmureanu, Luminita
Luoma, Krista
Marinoni, Angela
Pikridas, Michael
Schauer, Gerhard
Serfozo, Norbert
Servomaa, Henri
Titos, Gloria
Yus-Díez, Jesús
Zioła, Natalia
Wiedensohler, Alfred
Minguillón, María Cruz [0000-0002-5464-0391]
Cuesta-Mosquera, Andrea
Močnik, Griša
Drinovec, Luka
Müller, Thomas
Pfeifer, Sascha
Minguillón, María Cruz
Briel, Björn
Buckley, Paul
Dudoitis, Vadimas
Fernández-García, Javier
Fernández-Amado, María
Ferreira De Brito, Joel
Riffault, Veronique
Flentje, Harald
Heffernan, Eimear
Kalivitis, Nikos
Kalogridis, Athina-Cerise
Keernik, Hannes
Marmureanu, Luminita
Luoma, Krista
Marinoni, Angela
Pikridas, Michael
Schauer, Gerhard
Serfozo, Norbert
Servomaa, Henri
Titos, Gloria
Yus-Díez, Jesús
Zioła, Natalia
Wiedensohler, Alfred
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aerosolized black carbon is monitored worldwide to quantify its impact on air quality and climate. Given its importance, measurements of black carbon mass concentrations must be conducted with instruments operating in quality-checked and ensured conditions to generate data which are reliable and comparable temporally and geographically. In this study, we report the results from the largest characterization and intercomparison of filter-based absorption photometers, the Aethalometer model AE33, belonging to several European monitoring networks. Under controlled laboratory conditions, a total of 23 instruments measured mass concentrations of black carbon from three well-characterized aerosol sources: synthetic soot, nigrosin particles, and ambient air from the urban background of Leipzig, Germany. The objective was to investigate the individual performance of the instruments and their comparability; we analyzed the response of the instruments to the different aerosol sources and the impact caused by the use of obsolete filter materials and the application of maintenance activities. Differences in the instrument-to-instrument variabilities from equivalent black carbon (eBC) concentrations reported at 880 nm were determined before maintenance activities (for soot measurements, average deviation from total least square regression was −2.0 % and the range −16 % to 7 %; for nigrosin measurements, average deviation was 0.4 % and the range −15 % to 17 %), and after they were carried out (for soot measurements, average deviation was −1.0 % and the range −14 % to 8 %; for nigrosin measurements, the average deviation was 0.5 % and the range −12 % to 15 %). The deviations are in most of the cases explained by the type of filter material employed by the instruments, the total particle load on the filter, and the flow calibration. The results of this intercomparison activity show that relatively small unit-to-unit variability of AE33-based particle light absorbing measurements is

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1286574185
Document Type :
Electronic Resource