Back to Search Start Over

Global Carbon Budget 2016

Authors :
Le Quere, Corinne
Andrew, Robbie M.
Canadell, Josep G.
Sitch, Stephen
Korsbakken, Jan Ivar
Peters, Glen P.
Manning, Andrew C.
Boden, Thomas A.
Tans, Pieter P.
Houghton, Richard A.
Keeling, Ralph F.
Alin, Simone
Andrews, Oliver D.
Anthoni, Peter
Barbero, Leticia
Bopp, Laurent
Chevallier, Frederic
Chini, Louise P.
Ciais, Philippe
Currie, Kim
Delire, Christine
Doney, Scott C.
Friedlingstein, Pierre
Gkritzalis, Thanos
Harris, Ian
Hauck, Judith
Haverd, Vanessa
Hoppema, Mario
Goldewijk, Kees Klein
Jain, Atul K.
Kato, Etsushi
Koertzinger, Arne
Landschuetzer, Peter
Lefevre, Nathalie
Lenton, Andrew
Lienert, Sebastian
Lombardozzi, Danica
Melton, Joe R.
Metzl, Nicolas
Millero, Frank
Monteiro, Pedro M. S.
Munro, David R.
Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
Nakaoka, Shin-ichiro
O'Brien, Kevin
Olsen, Are
Omar, Abdirahman M.
Ono, Tsuneo
Pierrot, Denis
Poulter, Benjamin
Roedenbeck, Christian
Salisbury, Joe
Schuster, Ute
Schwinger, Joerg
Seferian, Roland
Skjelvan, Ingunn
Stocker, Benjamin D.
Sutton, Adrienne J.
Takahashi, Taro
Tian, Hanqin
Tilbrook, Bronte
Van Der Laan-luijkx, Ingrid T.
Van Der Werf, Guido R.
Viovy, Nicolas
Walker, Anthony P.
Wiltshire, Andrew J.
Zaehle, Soenke
Le Quere, Corinne
Andrew, Robbie M.
Canadell, Josep G.
Sitch, Stephen
Korsbakken, Jan Ivar
Peters, Glen P.
Manning, Andrew C.
Boden, Thomas A.
Tans, Pieter P.
Houghton, Richard A.
Keeling, Ralph F.
Alin, Simone
Andrews, Oliver D.
Anthoni, Peter
Barbero, Leticia
Bopp, Laurent
Chevallier, Frederic
Chini, Louise P.
Ciais, Philippe
Currie, Kim
Delire, Christine
Doney, Scott C.
Friedlingstein, Pierre
Gkritzalis, Thanos
Harris, Ian
Hauck, Judith
Haverd, Vanessa
Hoppema, Mario
Goldewijk, Kees Klein
Jain, Atul K.
Kato, Etsushi
Koertzinger, Arne
Landschuetzer, Peter
Lefevre, Nathalie
Lenton, Andrew
Lienert, Sebastian
Lombardozzi, Danica
Melton, Joe R.
Metzl, Nicolas
Millero, Frank
Monteiro, Pedro M. S.
Munro, David R.
Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
Nakaoka, Shin-ichiro
O'Brien, Kevin
Olsen, Are
Omar, Abdirahman M.
Ono, Tsuneo
Pierrot, Denis
Poulter, Benjamin
Roedenbeck, Christian
Salisbury, Joe
Schuster, Ute
Schwinger, Joerg
Seferian, Roland
Skjelvan, Ingunn
Stocker, Benjamin D.
Sutton, Adrienne J.
Takahashi, Taro
Tian, Hanqin
Tilbrook, Bronte
Van Der Laan-luijkx, Ingrid T.
Van Der Werf, Guido R.
Viovy, Nicolas
Walker, Anthony P.
Wiltshire, Andrew J.
Zaehle, Soenke
Source :
Earth System Science Data (1866-3508) (Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh), 2016-11 , Vol. 8 , N. 2 , P. 605-649
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere - the "global carbon budget" - is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics, and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates and consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (E-FF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (E-LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover change data, fire activity associated with deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (G(ATM)) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO2 sink (S-OCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in S-OCEAN is evaluated with data products based on surveys of ocean CO2 measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO2 sink (S-LAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of independent dynamic global vegetation models. We compare the mean land and ocean fluxes and their variability to estimates from three atmospheric inverse methods for three broad latitude bands. All uncertainties are reported as +/- 1 sigma, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2006-2015)

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Earth System Science Data (1866-3508) (Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh), 2016-11 , Vol. 8 , N. 2 , P. 605-649
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1286169018
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194.essd-8-605-2016