Back to Search Start Over

Sequential Combination of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Standard Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial by the EORTC and GIMEMA Consortium (AML-17).

Authors :
Amadori, S.
Suciu, S.
Stasi, R.
Salih, H.R.
Selleslag, D.
Muus, P.
Fabritiis, P. De
Venditti, A.
Ho, A.D.
Lubbert, M.
Thomas, X.
Latagliata, R.
Halkes, C.J.
Falzetti, F.
Magro, D.
Guimaraes, J.E.
Berneman, Z.
Specchia, G.
Karrasch, M.
Fazi, P.
Vignetti, M.
Willemze, R.
Witte, T.J. de
Marie, J.P.
Amadori, S.
Suciu, S.
Stasi, R.
Salih, H.R.
Selleslag, D.
Muus, P.
Fabritiis, P. De
Venditti, A.
Ho, A.D.
Lubbert, M.
Thomas, X.
Latagliata, R.
Halkes, C.J.
Falzetti, F.
Magro, D.
Guimaraes, J.E.
Berneman, Z.
Specchia, G.
Karrasch, M.
Fazi, P.
Vignetti, M.
Willemze, R.
Witte, T.J. de
Marie, J.P.
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology; 4424; 4430; 0732-183X; 35; 31; ~Journal of Clinical Oncology~4424~4430~~~0732-183X~35~31~~
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext<br />PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m(2) on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. CONCLUSION: As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age >/= 70 years.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology; 4424; 4430; 0732-183X; 35; 31; ~Journal of Clinical Oncology~4424~4430~~~0732-183X~35~31~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284150054
Document Type :
Electronic Resource