Back to Search Start Over

The pharmacokinetics and acceptability of lopinavir/ritonavir minitab sprinkles, tablets, and syrups in african HIV-infected children

Authors :
Musiime, V.
Fillekes, Q.
Kekitiinwa, A.
Kendall, L.
Keishanyu, R.
Namuddu, R.
Young, N.
Opilo, W.
Lallemant, M.
Walker, A.S.
Burger, D.M.
Gibb, D.M.
Musiime, V.
Fillekes, Q.
Kekitiinwa, A.
Kendall, L.
Keishanyu, R.
Namuddu, R.
Young, N.
Opilo, W.
Lallemant, M.
Walker, A.S.
Burger, D.M.
Gibb, D.M.
Source :
JAIDS : Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes; 148; 154; 1525-4135; 2; 66; ~JAIDS : Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes~148~154~~~1525-4135~2~66~~
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext<br />BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as first- and second-line therapy for young and older HIV-infected children, respectively. Available formulations have limitations making their widespread use complex. METHODS: An open-label comparative bioavailability (randomized crossover) study compared a novel twice-daily minitab sprinkle formulation (40 mg/10 mg, Cipla Pharmaceuticals) versus innovator syrup in HIV-infected Ugandan infants aged 3 to <12 months (cohort A) and children aged 1-4 years (cohort B) and versus Cipla tablets (100/25 mg) in children aged 4 to <13 years (cohort C). Twelve-hour intensive pharmacokinetic sampling after observed LPV/r intake (plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) following World Health Organization 2010 dosing with food was performed 4 weeks after enrollment. Children then switched formulation; sampling was repeated at week 8. Acceptability data were also collected. RESULTS: Seventy-seven infants/children were included in cohort A (n = 19)/B (n = 26)/C (n = 32). Among 132 evaluable pharmacokinetic profiles, there were 13/21/25 within-child comparisons in cohort A/B/C. For minitabs versus syrup, geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] AUC0-12h was 88.6 (66.7-117.6) versus 77.6 (49.5-121.5) h.mg/L in cohort A [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI) = 1.14 (0.71 to 1.85)] and 138.7 (118.2 to 162.6) versus 109.1 (93.7 to 127.1) h.mg/L in cohort B [GMR (90% CI) = 1.27 (1.10 to 1.46)]. For minitabs versus tablets, geometric mean (95% CI) AUC0-12h was 83.1 (66.7 to 103.5) versus 115.6 (103.0 to 129.7) h.mg/L; GMR (90% CI) = 0.72 (0.60 to 0.86). Subtherapeutic levels (<1.0 mg/L) occurred in 0 (0%)/2 (15%) minitabs/syrup in infants (P = 0.48), no children aged 1-4 years and 4 (16%)/1 (4%) minitabs/tablets (P = 0.35). About 13/17 (76%) and 19/26 (73%) caregivers of infants and children aged 1-4 years, respectively, chose to continue minitabs after week 8, mainly for convenience; only 7/29 (24%) older childr

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
JAIDS : Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes; 148; 154; 1525-4135; 2; 66; ~JAIDS : Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes~148~154~~~1525-4135~2~66~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284122195
Document Type :
Electronic Resource