Back to Search Start Over

Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Costa, D.W. da
Bouwense, S.A.
Schepers, N.J.
Besselink, M.G.
Santvoort, H.C. van
Brunschot, S. van
Bakker, O.J.
Bollen, T.L.
Dejong, C.H.
Goor, H. van
Boermeester, M.A.
Bruno, M.J.
Eijck, C.H. van
Timmer, R.
Weusten, B.L.
Consten, E.C.
Brink, M.A.
Spanier, B.W.
Bilgen, E.J.
Nieuwenhuijs, V.B.
Hofker, H.S.
Rosman, C.
Voorburg, A.M.
Bosscha, K.
Duijvendijk, P. van
Gerritsen, J.J.
Heisterkamp, J.
Hingh, I.H. de
Witteman, B.J.
Kruyt, P.M.
Scheepers, J.J.
Molenaar, I.Q.
Schaapherder, A.F.
Manusama, E.R.
Waaij, L.A. van der
Unen, J. van
Dijkgraaf, M.G.
Ramshorst, B. van
Gooszen, H.G.
Boerma, D.
Costa, D.W. da
Bouwense, S.A.
Schepers, N.J.
Besselink, M.G.
Santvoort, H.C. van
Brunschot, S. van
Bakker, O.J.
Bollen, T.L.
Dejong, C.H.
Goor, H. van
Boermeester, M.A.
Bruno, M.J.
Eijck, C.H. van
Timmer, R.
Weusten, B.L.
Consten, E.C.
Brink, M.A.
Spanier, B.W.
Bilgen, E.J.
Nieuwenhuijs, V.B.
Hofker, H.S.
Rosman, C.
Voorburg, A.M.
Bosscha, K.
Duijvendijk, P. van
Gerritsen, J.J.
Heisterkamp, J.
Hingh, I.H. de
Witteman, B.J.
Kruyt, P.M.
Scheepers, J.J.
Molenaar, I.Q.
Schaapherder, A.F.
Manusama, E.R.
Waaij, L.A. van der
Unen, J. van
Dijkgraaf, M.G.
Ramshorst, B. van
Gooszen, H.G.
Boerma, D.
Source :
The Lancet (London); 1261; 1268; 0140-6736; 10000; 386; ~The Lancet (London)~1261~1268~~~0140-6736~10000~386~~
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 152695.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)<br />BACKGROUND: In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. METHODS: For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged >/=18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25-30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancr

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The Lancet (London); 1261; 1268; 0140-6736; 10000; 386; ~The Lancet (London)~1261~1268~~~0140-6736~10000~386~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284085506
Document Type :
Electronic Resource