Back to Search Start Over

Coverage of the 2011 Q fever vaccination campaign in the Netherlands, using retrospective population-based prevalence estimation of cardiovascular risk-conditions for chronic Q fever

Authors :
Vermeer-de Bondt, P.E.
Schoffelen, T.
Vanrolleghem, A.M.
Isken, L.D.
Deuren, M. van
Sturkenboom, M.C.
Timen, A.
Vermeer-de Bondt, P.E.
Schoffelen, T.
Vanrolleghem, A.M.
Isken, L.D.
Deuren, M. van
Sturkenboom, M.C.
Timen, A.
Source :
PLoS One; 1932-6203; 4; 10; e0123570; ~PLoS One~~~~~1932-6203~4~10~~e0123570
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 154899.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access)<br />BACKGROUND: In 2011, a unique Q fever vaccination campaign targeted people at risk for chronic Q fever in the southeast of the Netherlands. General practitioners referred patients with defined cardiovascular risk-conditions (age >15 years). Prevalence rates of those risk-conditions were lacking, standing in the way of adequate planning and coverage estimation. We aimed to obtain prevalence rates retrospectively in order to estimate coverage of the Q fever vaccination campaign. METHODS: With broad search terms for these predefined risk-conditions, we extracted patient-records from a large longitudinal general-practice research-database in the Netherlands (IPCI-database). After validation of these records, obtained prevalence rates (stratified for age and sex) extrapolated to the Q fever high-incidence area population, gave an approximation of the size of the targeted patient-group. Coverage calculation addressed people actually screened by a pre-vaccination Q fever skin test and serology (coverage) and patients referred by their general practitioners (adjusted-coverage) in the 2011 campaign. RESULTS: Our prevalence estimate of any risk-condition was 3.1% (lower-upper limits 2.9-3.3%). For heart valve defects, aorta aneurysm/prosthesis, congenital anomalies and endocarditis, prevalence was 2.4%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively. Estimated number of eligible people in the Q fever high-incidence area was 11,724 (10,965-12,532). With 1330 people screened for vaccination, coverage of the vaccination campaign was 11%. For referred people, the adjusted coverage was 18%. Coverage was lowest among the very-old and highest for people aged 50-70 years. CONCLUSION: The estimated coverage of the vaccination campaign was limited. This should be interpreted in the light of the complexity of this target-group with much co-morbidity, and of the vaccine that required invasive pre-vaccination screening. Calculation of prevalence rates of risk-conditions based on the IPCI-database was

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
PLoS One; 1932-6203; 4; 10; e0123570; ~PLoS One~~~~~1932-6203~4~10~~e0123570
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284083951
Document Type :
Electronic Resource