Back to Search Start Over

Improved diagnostic validity of the ADOS revised algorithms: a replication study in an independent sample.

Authors :
Oosterling, I.J.
Roos, S.
Bildt, A. de
Lambregts-Rommelse, N.N.J.
Jonge, M. de
Visser, J.
Lappenschaar, M.
Swinkels, S.H.N.
Gaag, R.J. van der
Buitelaar, J.K.
Oosterling, I.J.
Roos, S.
Bildt, A. de
Lambregts-Rommelse, N.N.J.
Jonge, M. de
Visser, J.
Lappenschaar, M.
Swinkels, S.H.N.
Gaag, R.J. van der
Buitelaar, J.K.
Source :
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders; 689; 703; 0162-3257; 6; 40; ~Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders~689~703~~~0162-3257~6~40~~
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

1 juni 2010<br />Contains fulltext : 88133.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)<br />Recently, Gotham et al. (2007) proposed revised algorithms for the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) with improved diagnostic validity. The aim of the current study was to replicate predictive validity, factor structure, and correlations with age and verbal and nonverbal IQ of the ADOS revised algorithms for Modules 1 and 2 in a large independent Dutch sample (N = 532). Results showed that the improvement of diagnostic validity was most apparent for autism, except in very young or low functioning children. Results for other autism spectrum disorders were less consistent. Overall, these findings support the use of the more homogeneous revised algorithms, with the use of similar items across developmental cells making it easier to compare ADOS scores within and between individuals.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders; 689; 703; 0162-3257; 6; 40; ~Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders~689~703~~~0162-3257~6~40~~
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1284016501
Document Type :
Electronic Resource