Back to Search Start Over

Detailed Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Relapsed After the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Trials : MCL2 and MCL3

Authors :
Eskelund, Christian Winther
Dimopoulos, Kostas
Kolstad, Arne
Glimelius, Ingrid
Raty, Riikka
Gjerdrum, Lise Mette Rahbek
Sonnevi, Kristina
Josefsson, Par
Nilsson-Ehle, Herman
Bentzen, Hans H. N.
Fagerli, Unn Merete
Kuittinen, Outi
Haaber, Jacob
Niemann, Carsten Utoft
Pedersen, Lone Bredo
Larsen, Maria Torp
Geisler, Christian Hartmann
Hutchings, Martin
Jerkeman, Mats
Gronbaek, Kirsten
Eskelund, Christian Winther
Dimopoulos, Kostas
Kolstad, Arne
Glimelius, Ingrid
Raty, Riikka
Gjerdrum, Lise Mette Rahbek
Sonnevi, Kristina
Josefsson, Par
Nilsson-Ehle, Herman
Bentzen, Hans H. N.
Fagerli, Unn Merete
Kuittinen, Outi
Haaber, Jacob
Niemann, Carsten Utoft
Pedersen, Lone Bredo
Larsen, Maria Torp
Geisler, Christian Hartmann
Hutchings, Martin
Jerkeman, Mats
Gronbaek, Kirsten
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with a highly variable clinical course. The prognosis after relapse is generally poor, and no standard of care exists. We investigated the postrelapse outcomes of 149 patients who were initially treated in the Nordic Lymphoma Group trials, MCL2 or MCL3, both representing intensive cytarabine-containing frontline regimens including autologous stem cell transplant. Patients with progression of disease before 24 months (POD24, n = 51, 34%) displayed a median overall survival of 6.6 months compared with 46 months for patients with later POD (n = 98, 66%; P < 0.001). MCL international prognostic index, cell proliferation marker, blastoid morphology, and TP53 mutations showed independent prognostic value irrespective of POD24, and in a combined, exploratory risk score, patients with 0, 1, 2-3, or 4-5 high-risk markers, respectively, displayed a 5-year overall survival of 62%, 39%, 31%, and 0%. By a comparison of median progression-free survival of the different salvage therapies in the relapse setting, bendamustine-rituximab was superior to all other combination chemotherapy regimens; however, it was also associated with longer responses to last line of therapy. Collectively, we confirm the prognostic impact of POD24 and highlight the relevance of other biomarkers, and we emphasize the importance of novel therapies for patients with high-risk features at first POD.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1280631504
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097.HS9.0000000000000510