Back to Search Start Over

Final environmental statement: Hahn Shopping Center (Marin Mall Regional Shopping Center), Corte Madera, Marin County, California: Regulatory permit application by Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., public notice no. 11101-47

Authors :
United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. San Francisco District
United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. San Francisco District
Source :
78-1218F.pdf
Publication Year :
1978

Abstract

HAHN SHOPPING CENTER (MARIN MALL REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER)CORTE MADERA, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Public Notice No. 11101-47 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ERRATA SHEET Page Paragraph Addition or Correction 5,20, 44 1.11(h), 2.49, 4.39 In a telephone conversation on 23 May 1978, JoDuphie of the Marin Municipal Water District,provided an update of the water supply situation The Water District Board of Directors is-at this time considering the lifting of the water moratorium for their service area. A California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review will likely be carried out by the Water District as part of the decision making process concerning the lifting of the moratorium.The Water District Board of Directors is now develop­ing a Safe Water Supply Program which would be used as the primary guideline for determining water availa­bility for projects such as the Marin Mall. 25 2.72 This paragraph discusses the Air Quality MaintenancePlan for the San Francisco Bay Area air basin. It should be noted that the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency is now requiring State Implementation Plans (SIP's) by 1 January 1979 which show how National Standards can be attained by December of 1982. For Oxidant and Carbon Monoxide extensions may be granted to 1987 if all reasonable technology has been applied.The 3 March 1978 issue of the Federal Register announced that the Bay Area does now not meet the Primary Standards for Oxidant and Carbon Monoxide and does not meet the Secondary Standard for Total Suspended Particulate.Also, it should be noted that the Federal New Source Review program does not apply because a shopping center is•considered an "indirect source." 47 4.48 Reference is made to "Five different situations. ."which have been considered in Appendix B. Only four situations are listed in paragraph 4.48. The second item is missing and this should be "Projected 1985 activity levels, withoutthe Mall." All five situations are included in the Appendix. 57 5.01 "Some loss of sal

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
78-1218F.pdf
Notes :
Project Management Reports, San Francisco District, United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. San Francisco District, California, Marin County (Calif.); Corte Madera (Calif.), pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1269489750
Document Type :
Electronic Resource