Back to Search Start Over

Description of the multi-approach gravity field models from Swarm GPS data

Authors :
De Teixeira Da Encarnação, J. (author)
Visser, P.N.A.M. (author)
Arnold, Daniel (author)
Bezdek, Ales (author)
Doornbos, E.N. (author)
Ellmer, Matthias (author)
Guo, Junyi (author)
van den IJssel, J.A.A. (author)
Iorfida, E. (author)
De Teixeira Da Encarnação, J. (author)
Visser, P.N.A.M. (author)
Arnold, Daniel (author)
Bezdek, Ales (author)
Doornbos, E.N. (author)
Ellmer, Matthias (author)
Guo, Junyi (author)
van den IJssel, J.A.A. (author)
Iorfida, E. (author)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Although the knowledge of the gravity of the Earth has improved considerably with CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE (see appendices for a list of abbreviations) satellite missions, the geophysical community has identified the need for the continued monitoring of the time-variable component with the purpose of estimating the hydrological and glaciological yearly cycles and long-term trends. Currently, the GRACE-FO satellites are the sole dedicated provider of these data, while previously the GRACE mission fulfilled that role for 15 years. There is a data gap spanning from July 2017 to May 2018 between the end of the GRACE mission and start the of GRACE-FO, while the Swarm satellites have collected gravimetric data with their GPS receivers since December 2013. We present high-quality gravity field models (GFMs) from Swarm data that constitute an alternative and independent source of gravimetric data, which could help alleviate the consequences of the 10-month gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO, as well as the short gaps in the existing GRACE and GRACE-FO monthly time series. The geodetic community has realized that the combination of different gravity field solutions is superior to any individual model and set up the Combination Service of Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) under the umbrella of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS), part of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). We exploit this fact and deliver the highest-quality monthly GFMs, resulting from the combination of four different gravity field estimation approaches. All solutions are unconstrained and estimated independently from month to month. We tested the added value of including kinematic baselines (KBs) in our estimation of GFMs and conclude that there is no significant improvement. The non-gravitational accelerations measured by the accelerometer on board Swarm C were also included in our processing to determine if this would improve the quality of the GFMs, but we observed that is only t<br />Astrodynamics & Space Missions

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1259580360
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194.essd-12-1385-2020