Back to Search Start Over

Ejection Fraction by Echocardiography for a Selective Use of Magnetic Resonance After Infarction

Authors :
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica - Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica
Generalitat Valenciana
Fundació La Marató de TV3
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Societat Catalana de Cardiologia
European Regional Development Fund
Agència Valenciana de la Innovació
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Marcos-Garces, Victor
Gavara, Jose
Lopez-Lereu, Maria P.
Monmeneu, Jose V.
Rios-Navarro, Cesar
De Dios, Elena
Pérez, Nerea
Cànoves, Joaquim
Gonzalez, Jessika
Minana, Gema
Nunez, Julio
de la Espriella, Rafael
Santas, Enrique
Moratal, David
Chorro, Francisco J.
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica - Departament d'Enginyeria Electrònica
Generalitat Valenciana
Fundació La Marató de TV3
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Societat Catalana de Cardiologia
European Regional Development Fund
Agència Valenciana de la Innovació
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Marcos-Garces, Victor
Gavara, Jose
Lopez-Lereu, Maria P.
Monmeneu, Jose V.
Rios-Navarro, Cesar
De Dios, Elena
Pérez, Nerea
Cànoves, Joaquim
Gonzalez, Jessika
Minana, Gema
Nunez, Julio
de la Espriella, Rafael
Santas, Enrique
Moratal, David
Chorro, Francisco J.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

[EN] Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) permits robust risk stratification of discharged ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients, but its indiscriminate use in all cases is not feasible. We evaluated the utility of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography for a selective use of CMR after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods Echocardiography and CMR were performed in 1119 patients discharged for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction included in a multicenter registry. The prognostic power of CMR beyond echocardiography-LVEF was assessed using adjusted C statistic, net reclassification improvement index, and integrated discrimination improvement index. Results During a 4.8-year median follow-up, 136 (12%) first major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred (47 cardiovascular deaths and 89 readmissions for acute heart failure). In the entire group, CMR-LVEF (but not echocardiography-LVEF) independently predicted MACE occurrence. The MACE rate significantly increased only in patients with CMR-LVEF<40% (>= 50%: 7%, 40%-49%: 9%, <40%: 27%, P<0.001). Most patients displayed echocardiography-LVEF >= 50% (629, 56%), and they had a low MACE rate (57/629, 9%). In patients with echocardiography-LVEF<50% (n=490, 44%), the MACE rate was also low in those with CMR-LVEF >= 40% (24/278, 9%) but significantly increased in patients with CMR-LVEF<40% (55/212, 26%; P<0.001). Compared with echocardiography-LVEF, CMR-LVEF significantly improved MACE prediction in the group of patients with echocardiography-LVEF<50% (C statistic, 0.80 versus 0.72; net reclassification improvement index, 0.73; integrated discrimination improvement index, 0.10) but not in those with echocardiography-LVEF >= 50% (C statistic 0.66 versus 0.66; net reclassification improvement index, 0.17; integrated discrimination improvement index, 0.01). Conclusions A straightforward strategy based on a selective use of CMR for risk prediction in ST-segment-elevati

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
TEXT, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1258892676
Document Type :
Electronic Resource