Back to Search Start Over

Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management

Authors :
Friedman, Rachel S.
Rhodes, Jonathan R.
Dean, Angela J.
Law, Elizabeth A.
Santika, Truly
Budiharta, Sugeng
Hutabarat, Joseph A.
Indrawan, Tito P.
Kusworo, Ahmad
Meijaard, Erik
St. John, Freya A.V.
Struebig, Matthew J.
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Friedman, Rachel S.
Rhodes, Jonathan R.
Dean, Angela J.
Law, Elizabeth A.
Santika, Truly
Budiharta, Sugeng
Hutabarat, Joseph A.
Indrawan, Tito P.
Kusworo, Ahmad
Meijaard, Erik
St. John, Freya A.V.
Struebig, Matthew J.
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Source :
Ecology and Society
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Participatory approaches to forest management have been promoted as a means of returning rights historically removed, and as a way of managing natural resources sustainably, fairly, and to improve livelihoods in communities. Top-down models of community-based forest management take the perspective that if people feel ownership over, have a voice in decisions about, and can benefit from surrounding ecosystems, then they will be motivated to maintain and protect them. However, even participatory approaches, such as community-based forest management, may not always result in clear positive outcomes for involvement in decision making and forest conservation. We examine whether an Indonesian government initiative for community-based forest management was positively associated with community members' participation in local decision making and support for conservation and sustainable management of forest resources, in the context of state-owned lands. We used household questionnaire data to compare villages with and without a community forest, and community forests over time in a case study region of West Kalimantan. Analyzing forest visitations, conservation support, and indicators of procedural equity, we found no consistent association between having a community forest and higher levels of participation in decision making or household support for forest conservation. However, well-being indicators were positively associated with more active participation. The level of support for forest conservation was also positively related to households' leadership in village institutions and higher levels of well-being, particularly subjective well-being, land tenure, and material wealth. These social-demographic factors are important considerations when designing and implementing community-based forest management, which strives for fair and just decision-making processes along with forest conservation. The findings highlight how existing socioeconomic contexts factor into local

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Ecology and Society
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1255564057
Document Type :
Electronic Resource