Back to Search Start Over

Combined mesenchymal stromal cell therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial in sheep

Authors :
Millar, Jonathan E.
Bartnikowski, Nicole
Passmore, Margaret R.
Obonyo, Nchafatso G.
Malfertheiner, Maximillian V.
von Bahr, Viktor
Redd, Meredith A.
See Hoe, Louise
Ki, Katrina K.
Pedersen, Sanne
Boyle, Andrew J.
Baillie, J. Kenneth
Shekar, Kiran
Palpant, Nathan
Suen, Jacky Y.
Matthay, Michael A.
McAuley, Daniel F.
Fraser, John F.
Millar, Jonathan E.
Bartnikowski, Nicole
Passmore, Margaret R.
Obonyo, Nchafatso G.
Malfertheiner, Maximillian V.
von Bahr, Viktor
Redd, Meredith A.
See Hoe, Louise
Ki, Katrina K.
Pedersen, Sanne
Boyle, Andrew J.
Baillie, J. Kenneth
Shekar, Kiran
Palpant, Nathan
Suen, Jacky Y.
Matthay, Michael A.
McAuley, Daniel F.
Fraser, John F.
Source :
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Rationale: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is a promising intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although trials to date have not investigated its use alongside extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent preclinical studies have suggested that combining these interventions may attenuate the efficacy of ECMO. Objectives: To determine the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in a model of ARDS and ECMO. Methods: ARDS was induced in 14 sheep, after which they were established on venovenous ECMO. Subsequently, they received either endobronchial induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human MSCs (hMSCs) (n = 7) or cell-free carrier vehicle (vehicle control; n = 7). During ECMO, a low VT ventilation strategy was employed in addition to protocolized hemodynamic support. Animals were monitored and supported for 24 hours. Lung tissue, bronchoalveolar fluid, and plasma were analyzed, in addition to continuous respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The administration of hMSCs did not improve oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2 mean difference =2146mmHg; P= 0.076) or pulmonary function.However, histological evidence of lung injury(lung injuryscoremeandifference=20.07;P=0.04) and BALIL-8 were reduced. In addition, hMSC-treated animals had a significantly lower cumulative requirement for vasopressor. Despite endobronchial administration, animals treated with hMSCs had a significant elevation in transmembrane oxygenator pressure gradients. Thiswas accompanied by more pulmonary artery thromboses and adherent hMSCs found on explanted oxygenator fibers. Conclusions: Endobronchial hMSC therapy in an ovine model of ARDS and ECMO can impair membrane oxygenator function and does not improve oxygenation. These data do not recommend the safe use of hMSCs during venovenous ECMO.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1255561203
Document Type :
Electronic Resource