Coordinating conjunctions in Sinitic languages and beyond : towards a new typology

The thesis presents a typological study of coordinating conjunctions in Sinitic languages (Chinese dialects) and other languages of the world, with emphasis on grammaticalization pathways via which conjunctions arise. The aim of this research is two-fold: to reconstruct the main grammaticalization paths of coordinating conjunctions in Sinitic languages, and to make typological generalizations and classifications vis-à-vis the found pathways through cross-linguistic comparison based on a large enough sample of the world’s languages. Accordingly, the main body of this thesis is divided into two parts. Part 1 traces three major sources of coordinating conjunctions in Sinitic languages. (i) Comitative verbs. Our study begins by examining the grammaticalization path of [comitative > conjunction] in Yue from diachronic and synchronic perspectives (with data from 47 modern varieties of Yue and 19 early Cantonese colloquial texts). The generalizations obtained are verified with other Chinese dialects (113 dialects). It is also observed that the use of morphologically complex disyllabic conjunction is commonly attested in southern Chinese dialects; and the conjunction HE 和 in Chinese originated from its [co-patient] function. (ii) Causative verbs. The polygrammaticalization path of causative verbs including HAN 喊, huan 喚, JIAO 教, etc. is reconstructed based on the data from 257 Chinese dialects. (iii) The numeral item liangge. Our data from 125 Chinese dialects suggest that the grammaticalization of liangge in Gansu-Qinghai and Hunan-Hubei dialects is a result of the combined force of internal change and language contact (with local non-Sinitic languages). Part 2 proposes a new typology of coordinating conjunctions with additional data from non-Sinitic languages. The expanded database consists of first-hand data from 278 languages / language varieties (with 645 grams) and second-hand data from 829 languages/language varieties (with 888 grams). We formulate a hypothesis th