Back to Search Start Over

MET Amplification Status in Therapy-Naive Adeno- and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Lung

Authors :
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Schultheis, Anne M.
Rueschoff, Josef
Binot, Elke
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Fassunke, Jana
Schulte, Wolfgang
Ko, Yon-Dschun
Schlesinger, Andreas
Bos, Marc
Gardizi, Masyar
Engel-Riedel, Walburga
Brockmann, Michael
Serke, Monika
Gerigk, Ulrich
Hekmat, Khosro
Frank, Konrad F.
Reiser, Marcel
Schulz, Holger
Krueger, Stefan
Stoelben, Erich
Zander, Thomas
Wolf, Juergen
Buettner, Reinhard
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Schultheis, Anne M.
Rueschoff, Josef
Binot, Elke
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Fassunke, Jana
Schulte, Wolfgang
Ko, Yon-Dschun
Schlesinger, Andreas
Bos, Marc
Gardizi, Masyar
Engel-Riedel, Walburga
Brockmann, Michael
Serke, Monika
Gerigk, Ulrich
Hekmat, Khosro
Frank, Konrad F.
Reiser, Marcel
Schulz, Holger
Krueger, Stefan
Stoelben, Erich
Zander, Thomas
Wolf, Juergen
Buettner, Reinhard
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose: MET is a potential therapeutic target in lung cancer and both MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have entered clinical trials. MET signaling can be activated by various mechanisms, including gene amplification. In this study, we aimed to investigate MET amplification status in adeno- and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. We propose clearly defined amplification scores and provide epidemiologic data on MET amplification in lung cancer. Experimental Design: We evaluated the prevalence of increased MET gene copy numbers in 693 treatment-naive cancers by FISH, defined clear cutoff criteria, and correlated FISH results to MET IHC. Results: Two thirds (67%) of lung cancers do not have gains in MET gene copy numbers, whereas 3% show a clear-cut high-level amplification (MET/centromer7 ratio =2.0 or average gene copy number per nucleus =6.0 or =10% of tumor cells containing =15 MET copies). The remaining cases can be subdivided into intermediate- (6%) and low-level gains (24%). Importantly, MET amplifications occur at equal frequencies in squamous and adenocarcinomas without or with EGFR or KRAS mutations. Conclusion: MET amplification is not a mutually exclusive genetic event in therapy-naive non-small cell lung cancer. Our data suggest that it might be useful to determine MET amplification (i) before EGFR inhibitor treatment to identify possible primary resistance to anti-EGFR treatment, and (ii) to select cases that harbor KRAS mutations additionally to MET amplification and, thus, may not benefit from MET inhibition. Furthermore, our study provides comprehensive epidemiologic data for upcoming trials with various MET inhibitors. (C) 2014 AACR.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1247373007
Document Type :
Electronic Resource