Back to Search Start Over

Radial artery access is associated with lower mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI : a report from the SWEDEHEART registry

Authors :
Dworeck, Christian
Redfors, Björn
Völz, Sebastian
Haraldsson, Inger
Angerås, Oskar
Råmunddal, Truls
Ioanes, Dan
Myredal, Anna
Odenstedt, Jacob
Hirlekar, Geir
Koul, Sasha
Fröbert, Ole
Linder, Rickard
Venetsanos, Dimitrios
Hofmann, Robin
Ulvenstam, Anders
Petursson, Petur
Sarno, Giovanna
James, Stefan
Erlinge, David
Omerovic, Elmir
Dworeck, Christian
Redfors, Björn
Völz, Sebastian
Haraldsson, Inger
Angerås, Oskar
Råmunddal, Truls
Ioanes, Dan
Myredal, Anna
Odenstedt, Jacob
Hirlekar, Geir
Koul, Sasha
Fröbert, Ole
Linder, Rickard
Venetsanos, Dimitrios
Hofmann, Robin
Ulvenstam, Anders
Petursson, Petur
Sarno, Giovanna
James, Stefan
Erlinge, David
Omerovic, Elmir
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of radial artery access versus femoral artery access on the risk of 30-day mortality, inhospital bleeding and cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We used data from the SWEDEHEART registry and included all patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden between 2005 and 2016. We compared patients who had percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access versus femoral access with regard to the primary endpoint of all-cause death within 30 days, using a multilevel propensity score adjusted logistic regression which included hospital as a random effect. Results During the study period, 44,804 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention of whom 24,299 (54.2%) had radial access and 20,505 (45.8%) femoral access. There were 2487 (5.5%) deaths within 30 days, of which 920 (3.8%) occurred in the radial access and 1567 (7.6%) in the femoral access group. After propensity score adjustment, radial access was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–0.88, P = 0.025). We found no interaction between access site and age, gender and cardiogenic shock regarding 30-day mortality. Radial access was also associated with a lower adjusted risk of bleeding (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.79, P = 0.006) and cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.73, P = 0.002). Conclusions In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial access rather than femoral access was associated with an adjusted lower risk of death, bleeding and cardiogenic shock. Our findings are consistent with, and add external validity to, recent randomised trials.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1235304460
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177.2048872620908032