Back to Search Start Over

Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components.

Authors :
Smoktunowicz, Ewelina
Barak, Azy
Andersson, Gerhard
Banos, Rosa M
Berger, Thomas
Botella, Cristina
Dear, Blake F
Donker, Tara
Ebert, David D
Hadjistavropoulos, Heather
Hodgins, David C
Kaldo, Viktor
Mohr, David C
Nordgreen, Tine
Powers, Mark B
Riper, Heleen
Ritterband, Lee M
Rozental, Alexander
Schueller, Stephen M
Titov, Nickolai
Weise, Cornelia
Carlbring, Per
Smoktunowicz, Ewelina
Barak, Azy
Andersson, Gerhard
Banos, Rosa M
Berger, Thomas
Botella, Cristina
Dear, Blake F
Donker, Tara
Ebert, David D
Hadjistavropoulos, Heather
Hodgins, David C
Kaldo, Viktor
Mohr, David C
Nordgreen, Tine
Powers, Mark B
Riper, Heleen
Ritterband, Lee M
Rozental, Alexander
Schueller, Stephen M
Titov, Nickolai
Weise, Cornelia
Carlbring, Per
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and cost-effectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary. We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients, educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders.<br />Funding agencies: Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange within the Bekker programme

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1234664270
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016.j.invent.2020.100331