Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of the capacity of vehicle cabin air inlet filters to reduce diesel exhaust-induced symptoms in human volunteers

Authors :
Muala, Ala
Sehlstedt, Maria
Bion, Anne
Österlund, Camilla
Bosson, Jenny A.
Behndig, Annelie F.
Pourazar, Jamshid
Bucht, Anders
Boman, Christoffer
Mudway, Ian S.
Langrish, Jeremy P.
Couderc, Stephane
Blomberg, Anders
Sandström, Thomas
Muala, Ala
Sehlstedt, Maria
Bion, Anne
Österlund, Camilla
Bosson, Jenny A.
Behndig, Annelie F.
Pourazar, Jamshid
Bucht, Anders
Boman, Christoffer
Mudway, Ian S.
Langrish, Jeremy P.
Couderc, Stephane
Blomberg, Anders
Sandström, Thomas
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution especially derived from traffic is associated with increases in cardiorespiratory morbidity and mortality. In this study, we evaluated the ability of novel vehicle cabin air inlet filters to reduce diesel exhaust (DE)-induced symptoms and markers of inflammation in human subjects. METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects participated in a randomized double-blind controlled crossover study where they were exposed to filtered air, unfiltered DE and DE filtered through two selected particle filters, one with and one without active charcoal. Exposures lasted for one hour. Symptoms were assessed before and during exposures and lung function was measured before and after each exposure, with inflammation assessed in peripheral blood five hours after exposures. In parallel, PM were collected from unfiltered and filtered DE and assessed for their capacity to drive damaging oxidation reactions in a cell-free model, or promote inflammation in A549 cells. RESULTS: The standard particle filter employed in this study reduced PM10 mass concentrations within the exposure chamber by 46%, further reduced to 74% by the inclusion of an active charcoal component. In addition use of the active charcoal filter was associated by a 75% and 50% reduction in NO2 and hydrocarbon concentrations, respectively. As expected, subjects reported more subjective symptoms after exposure to unfiltered DE compared to filtered air, which was significantly reduced by the filter with an active charcoal component. There were no significant changes in lung function after exposures. Similarly diesel exhaust did not elicit significant increases in any of the inflammatory markers examined in the peripheral blood samples 5 hour post-exposure. Whilst the filters reduced chamber particle concentrations, the oxidative activity of the particles themselves, did not change following filtration with either filter. In contrast, diesel exhaust PM passed through the act

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1234178122
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186.1476-069X-13-16