Back to Search Start Over

Adjuvant Capecitabine in Combination With Docetaxel, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide for Early Breast Cancer : The Randomized Clinical FinXX Trial

Authors :
Joensuu, Heikki
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
Huovinen, Riikka
Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja
Tanner, Minna
Kokko, Riitta
Ahlgren, Johan
Auvinen, Paivi
Lahdenpera, Outi
Kosonen, Sanna
Villman, Kenneth
Nyandoto, Paul
Nilsson, Greger
Poikonen-Saksela, Paula
Kataja, Vesa
Junnila, Jouni
Bono, Petri
Lindman, Henrik
Joensuu, Heikki
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
Huovinen, Riikka
Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja
Tanner, Minna
Kokko, Riitta
Ahlgren, Johan
Auvinen, Paivi
Lahdenpera, Outi
Kosonen, Sanna
Villman, Kenneth
Nyandoto, Paul
Nilsson, Greger
Poikonen-Saksela, Paula
Kataja, Vesa
Junnila, Jouni
Bono, Petri
Lindman, Henrik
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Capecitabine is not considered a standard agent in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. The results of this study suggest that addition of adjuvant capecitabine to a regimen that contains docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide improves survival outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of capecitabine on long-term survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer, particularly in subgroups defined by cancer estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content, and HER2 content (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is an exploratory analysis of the multicenter FinXX randomized clinical trial that accrued 1500 women in Finland and Sweden between January 27, 2004, and May 29, 2007. About half received 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (T+CEF), while the other half received 3 cycles of docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine (TX+CEX). Data analysis took place between January 27, 2004, and December 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Following random allocation, 747 women received T+CEF, and 753 women received TX+CEX. Five patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat population (3 had overt distant metastases at the time of randomization; 2 withdrew consent). The median age of the remaining 1495 patients was 53 years at the time of study entry; 157 (11%) had axillary node-negative disease; 1142 (76%) had ER-positive cancer; and 282 (19%) had HER2-positive cancer. The median follow-up time after random allocation was 10.3 years. There was no significant difference in RFS or overall survival between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P = .23; and HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.66-1.07; P = .15; respectively). Breast cancer-specific survival tended to favor the

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1233372010
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001.jamaoncol.2016.6120