Back to Search Start Over

Week 96 results of the randomized, multicentre Maraviroc Switch (MARCH) study

Authors :
Pett, S. L.
Amin, J.
Horban, A.
Andrade-Villanueva, J.
Losso, M.
Porteiro, N.
Madero, J. S.
Belloso, W.
Tu, E.
Silk, D.
Kelleher, A.
Harrigan, R.
Clark, A.
Sugiura, W.
Wolff, M.
Gill, J.
Gatell, J.
Clarke, A.
Ruxrungtham, K.
Prazuck, T.
Kaiser, R.
Woolley, I.
Alberto Arnaiz, J.
Cooper, D.
Rockstroh, J. K.
Mallon, P.
Emery, S.
Pett, S. L.
Amin, J.
Horban, A.
Andrade-Villanueva, J.
Losso, M.
Porteiro, N.
Madero, J. S.
Belloso, W.
Tu, E.
Silk, D.
Kelleher, A.
Harrigan, R.
Clark, A.
Sugiura, W.
Wolff, M.
Gill, J.
Gatell, J.
Clarke, A.
Ruxrungtham, K.
Prazuck, T.
Kaiser, R.
Woolley, I.
Alberto Arnaiz, J.
Cooper, D.
Rockstroh, J. K.
Mallon, P.
Emery, S.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

ObjectivesThe Maraviroc Switch (MARCH) study week 48 data demonstrated that maraviroc, a chemokine receptor-5 (CCR5) inhibitor, was a safe and effective switch for the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) component of a two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] plus PI/r-based antiretroviral regimen in patients with R5-tropic virus. Here we report the durability of this finding. MethodsMARCH, an international, multicentre, randomized, 96-week open-label switch study, enrolled HIV-1-infected adults with R5-tropic virus who were stable (> 24 weeks) and virologically suppressed [plasma viral load (pVL) < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL]. Participants were randomized to continue their current PI/r-based regimen (PI/r) or to switch to MVC plus two N(t)RTIs (MVC) (1:2 randomization). The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion with pVL < 200 copies/mL at 96 weeks. The switch arm was defined as noninferior if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference was < -12% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety endpoints (the difference in the mean change from baseline or a comparison of proportions) were analysed as key secondary endpoints. ResultsEighty-two (PI/r) and 156 (MVC) participants were randomized and included in the ITT analysis; 71 (87%) and 130 (83%) were in follow-up and on therapy at week 96. At week 96, 89.0% and 90.4% in the PI/r and MVC arms, respectively, had pVL < 50 copies/mL (95% CI -6.6, 10.2). Moreover, in those switching away from PI/r, there were significant reductions in mean total cholesterol (differences 0.31 mmol/L; P = 0.02) and triglycerides (difference 0.44 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Changes in CD4 T-cell count, renal function, and serious and nonserious adverse events were similar in the two arms. ConclusionsMVC as a switch for a PI/r is safe and effective at maintaining virological suppression while having significant lipid benefits over 96 weeks.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1201320507
Document Type :
Electronic Resource