Back to Search Start Over

Multiple drug combinations of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide for first-line treatment in adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis

Authors :
Piechotta, Vanessa
Jakob, Tina
Langer, Peter
Monsef, Ina
Scheid, Christof
Estcourt, Lise J.
Ocheni, Sunday
Theurich, Sebastian
Kuhr, Kathrin
Scheckel, Benjamin
Adams, Anne
Skoetz, Nicole
Piechotta, Vanessa
Jakob, Tina
Langer, Peter
Monsef, Ina
Scheid, Christof
Estcourt, Lise J.
Ocheni, Sunday
Theurich, Sebastian
Kuhr, Kathrin
Scheckel, Benjamin
Adams, Anne
Skoetz, Nicole
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based hematological malignancy accounting for approximately two per cent of cancers. First-line treatment for transplant-ineligible individuals consists of multiple drug combinations of bortezomib (V), tenalidomide (R), or thalidomide (T). However, access to these medicines is restricted in many countries worldwide. Objectives To assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of multiple drug combinations of V. R, and T for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and to inform an application for the inclusion of these medicines into the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of essential medicines. Search methods We searched CENTRAL and MEDLI NE, conference proceedings and study registries on 14 February 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple drug combinations of V, R and 7 for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. Selection criteria We included RCTs comparing combination therapies of V, R, and T, plus melphatan and prednisone (MP) or dexamethasone (D) for first-line treatment of adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. We excluded trials including adults with relapsed or refractory disease, trials comparing drug therapies to other types of therapy and trials including second-generation novel agents. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included trials. As effect measures we used hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events. An HR or RR < 1 indicates an advantage for the intervention compared to the main comparator MR Where available, we extracted quality of life (QoL) data (scores of standardised questionnaires). Results quoted are from network meta-analysis (N MA) unless stated. Main results We included 25 studies (148 references) comprising 11,403 participants and 21 treatment regim

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1201316862
Document Type :
Electronic Resource