Host specificity in a diverse Neotropical tick community: an assessment using quantitative network analysis and host phylogeny

Background: Host specificity is a fundamental determinant of tick population and pathogen transmission dynamics, and therefore has important implications for human health. Tick host specificity is expected to be particularly high in the tropics, where communities of ticks, hosts and pathogens are most diverse. Yet the degree to which tropical tick species are host-specific remains poorly understood. Combining new field data with published records, we assessed the specificity of tick-host associations in Panama, a diverse Neotropical region.Methods: The resulting dataset includes 5,298 adult ticks belonging to 41 species of eight genera that were directly collected from 68 vertebrate host species of 17 orders. We considered three important aspects of tick hostspecificity: (i) the relative ecological importance of each host species (structural specificity); (ii) relatedness amonghost species (phylogenetic specificity); and (iii) spatial scale-dependence of tick-host relationships (geographicalspecificity). Applying quantitative network analyses and phylogenetic tools with null model comparisons, weassessed the structural and phylogenetic specificity across three spatial scales, ranging from central Panama tocountrywide. Further, we tested whether species-rich tick genera parasitized a wider variety of hosts thanspecies-poor genera, as expected when ticks specialize on different host species.Results: Most tick species showed high structural and/or phylogenetic specificity in the adult stage. However, aftercorrecting for sampling effort, we found little support for geographical specificity. Across the three scales, adult tickstended to be specific to a limited number of host species that were phylogenetically closely related. These hostspecies in turn, were parasitized by tick species from distinct genera, suggesting switching among distantly relatedhosts is common at evolutionary timescales. Further, there was a strong positive relationship between thetaxonomic richnes